2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The benefits and harms of rheumatic heart disease screening from the perspective of the screened population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis, using monthly benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections, still remains the most effective therapeutic intervention for prevention of disease progression in low‐ and middle‐income countries [1,2]. Therefore, screening of high‐risk populations for early identification of subclinical disease and the use of penicillin prophylaxis to prevent disease progression are essential steps for reducing the burden of disease in these countries where ARF and RHD still remain of public health importance [2,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis, using monthly benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections, still remains the most effective therapeutic intervention for prevention of disease progression in low‐ and middle‐income countries [1,2]. Therefore, screening of high‐risk populations for early identification of subclinical disease and the use of penicillin prophylaxis to prevent disease progression are essential steps for reducing the burden of disease in these countries where ARF and RHD still remain of public health importance [2,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been some concern about the benefits and potential harms of screening for RHD since the screening process may generate considerable anxiety in screened individuals, especially among those who are determined to be positives. 27 However, awareness about the disease is seen as a pre-requisite for any effective prevention program, and an educational presentation has been shown to reduce some of the apprehension related to screening studies. 28 In a study conducted in Gulu, Uganda, 4,773 students in the age group 5–15 from five schools underwent echocardiographic screening for RHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echocardiographic screening may have detrimental effects, specifically increased anxiety as well as a decrease in physical activity among those who receive an abnormal screening result. [35] Furthermore if the goal of screening is to institute secondary penicillin prophylaxis, we must determine whether prophylactic penicillin can mitigate progression in latent disease as it does in RHD diagnosed after clinically manifest ARF. [36][37][38][39][40] Administration of intra-muscular penicillin to children must be rigorously justified given it is painful [41] and causes significant trauma for the patient, parents and health care worker [42] with reports of significant peri-procedural anxiety, needle phobia, and medical fear.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%