“…As with other oxides, ionic diffusion is expected to be impeded by the combination of the highly ionic nature of the oxide host lattice and the large charge density of the MV ion. Electrochemical Li intercalation in MnO 2 was initially investigated as early as 1974, − while chemical insertion of Mg into a variety of MnO 2 phases was explored by Bruce et al Motivated by the abundant availability, environmental compatibility, low cost, the aforementioned large theoretical capacity, and structural versatility of a number of known MnO 2 polymorphs, electrochemical intercalation of Mg ,,− and Zn ,− in MnO 2 has received much attention recently. Researchers have suggested that the presence of large structural voids characteristic of some MnO 2 polymorphs, such as Hollandite (α-MnO 2 ), OMS-5 (a 4 × 2 tunnel structure under the Ramsdellite family), and the layered Birnessite (δ-MnO 2 ), as seen in Figure , could facilitate the diffusion of Mg 2+ (MV) ions. ,,, However, there is potential for conversion reactions that lead to the irreversible formation of MgO. , The presence of water in the cathode or electrolyte is reported to significantly affect the electrochemical performance of the MnO 2 system, with experiments claiming notable improvement in Mg-cycling in the layered-δ and the spinel-λ polymorphs ,, and a possible impact of water on the phase stability of the MnO 2 polymorphs upon Mg insertion. , Nevertheless, the presence of water can lead to parasitic side reactions, such as Mn 2+ dissolution − or proton intercalation (as discussed in previous sections), which can contribute to the electrochemical data observed.…”