Abstract:This chapter investigates the role of axiological drivers in solidarity activism with refugees. It examines how universal value orientations denote normative and relational orientations of care and posits that refugee solidarity activism is driven by the activists’ universal caring orientations to all vulnerable groups. Overall, the chapter illustrates how universal value orientations and moral commitments shape and orient political activism with refugees based on common ideational solidarity projects. These c… Show more
“…In this scenario, the critique of differential treatment of refugees will be compartmentalized to other movement fora less vital to the coordination of humanitarian relief and help. This is done to avoid jeopardizing the humanitarian operation central to the movement which would violate the central moral cause of the movement, helping the refugees they solidarize with (Fernández G. G. 2023;Toubøl 2017).…”
Section: The Eventfulness Of Micro-cohort Structured Frame Disputesmentioning
The transformation of social movement collective identity—the members shared under-standing of the movement’s purpose, goals and means—is a central concern of move-ment scholars. A main driver of such transformations is disputes over framing the movements’ purpose, which arise due to the entrance of new micro-cohorts of activists with different views than those of the veteran cohorts. This paper provides unique in-sight into the rarely studied process of such frame disputes by studying the entrance in-to the refugee solidarity movement of a new micro-cohort of activists mobilized in re-sponse to the 2022 war in Ukraine. While united in the endeavor to assist the victims of the war in Ukraine, veteran activists and newcomer activists strongly disagree on whether other groups of refugees should be entitled to the same relatively high level of help offered to the Ukrainian refugees. Online ethnography of movement activity on the social media of Facebook allows us to access the framing disputes as they unfold. While major ideological differences exist between the veteran and newcomer cohorts, frame disputes are rare. Rather than the expected clash between cohorts, we find that the contentious and humanitarian practices were compartmentalized into different Facebook fora.
“…In this scenario, the critique of differential treatment of refugees will be compartmentalized to other movement fora less vital to the coordination of humanitarian relief and help. This is done to avoid jeopardizing the humanitarian operation central to the movement which would violate the central moral cause of the movement, helping the refugees they solidarize with (Fernández G. G. 2023;Toubøl 2017).…”
Section: The Eventfulness Of Micro-cohort Structured Frame Disputesmentioning
The transformation of social movement collective identity—the members shared under-standing of the movement’s purpose, goals and means—is a central concern of move-ment scholars. A main driver of such transformations is disputes over framing the movements’ purpose, which arise due to the entrance of new micro-cohorts of activists with different views than those of the veteran cohorts. This paper provides unique in-sight into the rarely studied process of such frame disputes by studying the entrance in-to the refugee solidarity movement of a new micro-cohort of activists mobilized in re-sponse to the 2022 war in Ukraine. While united in the endeavor to assist the victims of the war in Ukraine, veteran activists and newcomer activists strongly disagree on whether other groups of refugees should be entitled to the same relatively high level of help offered to the Ukrainian refugees. Online ethnography of movement activity on the social media of Facebook allows us to access the framing disputes as they unfold. While major ideological differences exist between the veteran and newcomer cohorts, frame disputes are rare. Rather than the expected clash between cohorts, we find that the contentious and humanitarian practices were compartmentalized into different Facebook fora.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.