1960
DOI: 10.1071/ar9600774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The availability of potassium in some Tasmanian soils. II. Exhaustive cropping in relation to potassium reserves in the soil

Abstract: Five soil samples from Fingal, Tas., representing Frodsley sandy loam of varying exchangeable potassium status, were subjected to exhaustive cropping in pots and the changes in their potassium status and that of the crops measured. Three of the samples represented an area carrying improved pastures while two were from a less intensively managed property. The results were contrasted with those from two soils from South Australia (Urrbrae loam and Seddon gravelly sandy loam). The progressive removal of potassium… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of between 3.0 and 5.0 mmol c kg" 1 soil, have been used for soils with heavy textures or high CEC soils, while lower values are generally applied to sandy loams (Skene, 1956), i.e., soils with lower CEC values. For example, little response to applied K was found for ryegrass on some Tasmanian soils with exchangeable K (=RAK) levels greater than 1.0-1.5 mmol c kg" 1 (Piper and De Vires, 1960). For millet however, response to applied K was found when exchangeable K was below 1.1 mmol c kg' 1 in some soils in Eastern Nigeria (Ekpete, 1972), while 1.8-2.0 mmol c kg 1 exchangeable K was found to be critical for maize crop (Z mays L.) in Southern Nigeria (Sobulo, 1980;Agboola and Obigbesan, 1974).…”
Section: Readily Available Potassiummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Values of between 3.0 and 5.0 mmol c kg" 1 soil, have been used for soils with heavy textures or high CEC soils, while lower values are generally applied to sandy loams (Skene, 1956), i.e., soils with lower CEC values. For example, little response to applied K was found for ryegrass on some Tasmanian soils with exchangeable K (=RAK) levels greater than 1.0-1.5 mmol c kg" 1 (Piper and De Vires, 1960). For millet however, response to applied K was found when exchangeable K was below 1.1 mmol c kg' 1 in some soils in Eastern Nigeria (Ekpete, 1972), while 1.8-2.0 mmol c kg 1 exchangeable K was found to be critical for maize crop (Z mays L.) in Southern Nigeria (Sobulo, 1980;Agboola and Obigbesan, 1974).…”
Section: Readily Available Potassiummentioning
confidence: 98%