1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60639-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Cation Activity Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Q=I approach was known to be useful in understanding, characterizing, and evaluating the K þ fertility status of soils (Wang and Scott, 2001). In correlation studies, the parameters of Q=I alone or in combination have sometimes been shown to be a better prediction of K þ uptake by plants than exchangeable K þ measured by 1 M NH 4 OAc and help in understanding the mechanism of the K þ supply to plants (Beckett, 1972;Evangelou et al, 1994). Many workers used Q=I parameters for predicting K þ requirement of soils (Fergus et al, 1972;Singh and Jones, 1976;Sinclair, 1979;Sparks and Liebhardt, 1981;Evangelou and Blevins, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q=I approach was known to be useful in understanding, characterizing, and evaluating the K þ fertility status of soils (Wang and Scott, 2001). In correlation studies, the parameters of Q=I alone or in combination have sometimes been shown to be a better prediction of K þ uptake by plants than exchangeable K þ measured by 1 M NH 4 OAc and help in understanding the mechanism of the K þ supply to plants (Beckett, 1972;Evangelou et al, 1994). Many workers used Q=I parameters for predicting K þ requirement of soils (Fergus et al, 1972;Singh and Jones, 1976;Sinclair, 1979;Sparks and Liebhardt, 1981;Evangelou and Blevins, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending this hypothesis, a curve relating crop yield to the chemical potential of a nutrient in soil should be a characteristic of the plant, depending on its ability to remove the nutrient from the soil, under the prevailing environmental conditions. The nutrient potential is averaged over a specific period of growth (Talibudeen and Dey, 1968a;Addiscott and Talibudeen, 1969;Beckett, 1972). Talibudeen (1974) gave a schematic curve relating plant response to nutrient potential from which critical values can be identified that are characteristic of a plant during a particular growth phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stocks where, K d , pat1ition parameter (dm' kg-I). Potassium activity ratio (ARK) as suggested by Beckett and Nafady (1967) and Beckett (1972) and Hamdan et al (1999) was used for the transfonnation of K solution concentrations into activities and is rep0l1ed below: of metals as well as calcium were not acidified. Solution samples for batch studies were prepared by proper diluting stocks of metals and calcium with deionized water to give metal concentrations (as above), designated further as initial metal concentrations (CJ The pH of these solutions was measured but decreased progressively from 5.09 to 3.18 with increasing total metal concentrations from 0.4 to 32 mmol c dm-\ accordingly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, since magnesium and calcium are divalent cations, it is assumed that their behaviour in the soil solution will be similar, and therefore potassium activity should be directly referred both to Ca and Mg. This concept is widely promulgated by several workers (Woodruff 1955;Beckett and Nafady 1967;Beckett 1972;Sparks and Liebhardt 1981;Hamdan et a1. 1999) and restricted to K~Ca or K~(Ca + Mg) influence only.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%