2015
DOI: 10.1515/bhk-2015-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The autotelic involvement of attention induced by EEG neurofeedback training improves the performance of an athlete’s mind

Abstract: SummaryStudy aim: the aim of this study was to analyse the effects of neurofeedback-EEG, which consisted of visual stimulation with immediate feedback concerning brain activity on autotelic engagement attention and the performance of athletes' minds. Material and methods: the experimental group (25 subjects) underwent twenty neurofeedback-EEG training sessions (in the relaxation armchair) and athletic training for four months (every 7 days). The control group (25 subjects) underwent athletic training sessions.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common protocol found related to attention improvement was beta (12–15 Hz, 13–20 Hz, 15–18 Hz) up-regulation alongside theta (4–8 Hz) down-regulation or suppression in the central region (Gadea et al, 2016; Maszczyk et al, 2020; Mehran et al, 2015; Mikicin, 2015; Mikicin et al, 2015; Studer et al, 2014). The second most common protocol found was alpha power up-regulation (8–12 Hz) considering modulation on high (10–12 Hz) and low alpha (8–10 Hz) mostly in the central region but also in the frontal and parietal regions (Dekker, van den Berg, et al, 2014; Navarro Gil et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common protocol found related to attention improvement was beta (12–15 Hz, 13–20 Hz, 15–18 Hz) up-regulation alongside theta (4–8 Hz) down-regulation or suppression in the central region (Gadea et al, 2016; Maszczyk et al, 2020; Mehran et al, 2015; Mikicin, 2015; Mikicin et al, 2015; Studer et al, 2014). The second most common protocol found was alpha power up-regulation (8–12 Hz) considering modulation on high (10–12 Hz) and low alpha (8–10 Hz) mostly in the central region but also in the frontal and parietal regions (Dekker, van den Berg, et al, 2014; Navarro Gil et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches related to cognitive performance improvement in athletes develop protocols for increasing attentional control, focus, relaxation, and sleep quality (Dekker, van den Berg, et al, 2014;Jeunet et al, 2020;Mirifar et al, 2017;Rijken et al, 2016). Furthermore, processing speed, effectiveness, and work accuracy are also variables of enhancement on athletes (Mikicin et al, 2015(Mikicin et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Field Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the NF procedure was not associated with any clear modifications of neurophysiological patterns. Following this study, several other NF experiments have been led in the aim of enhancing athletes' performance in different sports including golf 11,12 , swimming 13 , dance 14,15 or athletics 16 . Mirifar et al 3 provided a systematic review of these NF studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the experimenter's bias was controlled in our research, because the preand post-training cognitive performance can be assessed by experimenters. In recent years, Mikicin, (2015) similarly proved the specificity of EEG-NFB frequency on behavioural changes; Kober et al, (2015) disclosed different cognitive influences for participants trained to increase the amplitude of frequencies.…”
Section: Eeg Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%