1991
DOI: 10.4141/cjps91-038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between potato tuber yield and the components of yield in irrigated and dryland environments in the prairies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heritability estimates of all the traits excepting ascorbic acid (0.25) were high enough (> 0.69 to 0.98) for selection to be effective. The results on heritability for tuber yield and tuber number were in accordance with the findings of Chaudhary (1985), Gaur et al (1985), Lynch and Kozub (1991) and Luthra et al Each genotype in a replication was planted in plot of 2.4 × 3 m 2 comprising four rows of each 3 m length at 60 (between rows) × 20 (within rows) cm 2 plants spacing. Sprouted seed tubers of 40-45 mm size were planted in the third week of October of respective year.…”
Section: Genetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Heritability estimates of all the traits excepting ascorbic acid (0.25) were high enough (> 0.69 to 0.98) for selection to be effective. The results on heritability for tuber yield and tuber number were in accordance with the findings of Chaudhary (1985), Gaur et al (1985), Lynch and Kozub (1991) and Luthra et al Each genotype in a replication was planted in plot of 2.4 × 3 m 2 comprising four rows of each 3 m length at 60 (between rows) × 20 (within rows) cm 2 plants spacing. Sprouted seed tubers of 40-45 mm size were planted in the third week of October of respective year.…”
Section: Genetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Sidhu & Pandita (1979), and Lemage & Caesar (1990) considered tuber number to be more important than average tuber weight in determining yield, whereas Maris (1969), Verma (1986), andJoseph et al (1992) considered the contrary to be true. Marls (1988), and Lynch & Kozub (1991) observed that while tuber number was more important for determining tuber yield in some of the progenies and environments, it was average tuber weight that was more important for tuber yield determination in other genotypes and environments. The results from this study suggest that tuber weight is more important in determining tuber yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potato tuber yield is influenced largely by the number of tubers and average tuber weight (Birhman and Kang, 1993). Lynch and Kozub (1991) observed that while number of tubers was more important in determining tuber yield in some progenies and environments, it was average tuber weight that was more important for tuber yield determination in other genotypes and environments. In this study, number of tubers was more important than average tuber weight for tuber yield determination going by its higher coefficient of determination (Table 5) and direct effect (Table 6).…”
Section: Inter Relationships Between Yield and Yield Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%