2018
DOI: 10.1177/0143831x18805848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between perceived personal power, team commitment and intrinsic motivation for permanent and temporary workers

Abstract: To date, research on how temporary workers are embedded in teams is limited to how they impact their co-workers with permanent contracts and how temporary workers impact team functioning and performance through power structures in teams. We know very little about how the perceptions of personal power of temporary and permanent workers affect their own motivation and commitment. This study aims to assess the relationship between perceived personal power, intrinsic motivation and team commitment for temporary ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the literature argues that, in contrast to full-time or long-term employment that offers relatively high employment security and opportunities for promotion and general/personal socio-economic development, temporary workers can not enjoy such privileges. More precisely, as summarized by de Jong et al (2019), temporary workers have a lower status in the eyes of both permanent and temporary workers, which is linked to lower authority and control and also generates lower job autonomy and less participation in decision-making activities. Therefore, temporary working contacts are characterized by reduced visibility of the employment relationship (Dutton et al , 1994; Sennett, 1998), which is considered an inhibiting factor for firm performance improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the literature argues that, in contrast to full-time or long-term employment that offers relatively high employment security and opportunities for promotion and general/personal socio-economic development, temporary workers can not enjoy such privileges. More precisely, as summarized by de Jong et al (2019), temporary workers have a lower status in the eyes of both permanent and temporary workers, which is linked to lower authority and control and also generates lower job autonomy and less participation in decision-making activities. Therefore, temporary working contacts are characterized by reduced visibility of the employment relationship (Dutton et al , 1994; Sennett, 1998), which is considered an inhibiting factor for firm performance improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the nonlinear mutation mechanism of the equilibrium nature of the system depends on the divergence mechanism of f  . Assuming '( ) 0 f x   , according to equations ( 4), (5), and (9), we have…”
Section: Fitting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They represent the points with the largest and smallest probability of random variables. Stochastic differential equations establish a connection between the potential function of a deterministic system and the static probability density function of a stochastic process [5]. Therefore, we can study the discrete changes of the "equilibrium state" in the statistical sense of the random process by studying the discrete changes of the mode and anti-mode of the deterministic function f  .…”
Section: Theoretical Tools-random Catastrophe Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Uradum et al, 2017). temporary employees are less dedicated than permanent employees, while other studies revealed that both types of employees are equally committed (Akhigbe & Ifeyinwa, 2017). De Jong et al (2019 found that temporary employees in the tourism industry had higher levels of affective and normative engagement than permanent employees and that the relational aspect of the psychological contract was nearly identical for both types of employees.…”
Section: Loyalty and Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 95%