Near-infrared spectroscopy devices can measure peripheral tissue oxygen saturation (StO 2). This study aims to compare StO 2 using INVOS ® and different O3™ settings (O3 25:75 and O3 30:70). Twenty adults were recruited. INVOS ® and O3™ probes were placed simultaneously on 1 side of forearm. After baseline measurement, the vascular occlusion test was initiated. The baseline value, rate of deoxygenation and reoxygenation, minimum and peak StO 2 , and time from cuff release to peak value were measured. The parameters were compared using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Bonferroni's correction and Mann-Whitney pairwise comparison were used for post hoc analysis. The agreement between StO 2 of devices was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. IN-VOS ® baseline value was higher (79.7 ± 6.4%) than that of O3 25:75 and O3 30:70 (62.4 ± 6.0% and 63.7 ± 5.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). The deoxygenation rate was higher with IN-VOS ® (10.6 ± 2.1%/min) than with O3 25:75 and O3 30:70 (8.4 ± 2.2%/min, p = 0.006 and 7.5 ± 2.1%/min, p < 0.001). The minimum and peak StO 2 were higher with INVOS ®. No significant difference in the reoxygenation rate was found between the devices and settings. The time to reach peak after cuff deflation was faster with INVOS ® (both p < 0.001). Other parameters were similar. There were no differences between the different O3™ settings. There were differences in StO 2 measurements between the devices, and these devices should not be interchanged. Differences were not observed between O3™ device settings.