2015
DOI: 10.1177/1757913915595831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and perception of risk for infection: a systematic review

Abstract: This systematic review tries to elucidate the association between what people know about HIV/AIDS and how they perceive their risk of infection. The initial search for articles yielded 1,595 abstracts, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. Five studies found a positive correlation, four reported a negative correlation and seven found no association between knowledge and risk perception. It was found that the existing psychometrically sound measure of HIV/AIDS risk perception had not been used in any of the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A small literature illustrates contexts where average HIV risk perceptions are at odds with actual disease prevalence [11, 12], and therefore suggests inaccuracies in self-perceived HIV risk. Potential drivers of inaccurate risk perceptions may include an incomplete consideration of the riskiness of sexual behaviors or the influence of factors outside of direct HIV risk factors [11, 1318]. However, no single study has systematically examined the influence of these diverse factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small literature illustrates contexts where average HIV risk perceptions are at odds with actual disease prevalence [11, 12], and therefore suggests inaccuracies in self-perceived HIV risk. Potential drivers of inaccurate risk perceptions may include an incomplete consideration of the riskiness of sexual behaviors or the influence of factors outside of direct HIV risk factors [11, 1318]. However, no single study has systematically examined the influence of these diverse factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this makes it challenging to distinguish individuals who actually have high likelihood of HIV infection apart from all those who perceived themselves as having low risk. While the knowledge of HIV/AIDS may facilitate accurate self‐risk assessment, our finding supported previous systematic review, which did not find this association . This could be that people cannot perceive the risk when they have not much knowledge, and an increase in knowledge to a certain point may improve risk perception; however, further increase in knowledge may reduce risk perception, because knowledge may produce biases in judgment, such as optimistic bias, psychological distancing and overconfidence, leading to inaccurate risk perception .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be explained by the belief that associates HIV risk with particular risk-recognized groups, i.e., MSM, injecting drug users and commercial sex workers rather than their risk behaviors [ 5 , 14 , 15 ]. The underlying mechanisms for false perception of low HIV risk among the students despite the high level of knowledge may include their risk assessment in light of remote or past low-risk behaviors despite current high-risk behaviors, optimistic bias that the risk behaviors they engaged in were at no or low-risk, denial or suppression mechanism and bias that they did not use facts in their judgment about risk perception but used certain cues inherent in the questions asked [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%