2019
DOI: 10.5336/medsci.2018-61970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Association Between Complete Blood Count and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

Abstract: oronary heart disease (CHD) remains a serious health problem. The reports revealed that CHD has caused 11.2% global deaths. Although crude mortality rate for CHD remains stable, this number increases rapidly with age. 1-3 Atherosclerosis of coronary arteries, the main cause of CHD, is a complex inflammatory disorder that causes the changes in the cells of the arterial wall and the blood components. 4,5 Several inflammatory biomarkers such as troponin, C reactive protein (CRP), and Btype natriuretic peptide (BN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we searched the relevant studies from major scientific websites and databases to collect the data of interest, and determined the association and effect estimates by calculating the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The protocols for the systematic review and meta-analysis were similar to those used in previous studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] , as well as to those recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we searched the relevant studies from major scientific websites and databases to collect the data of interest, and determined the association and effect estimates by calculating the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The protocols for the systematic review and meta-analysis were similar to those used in previous studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] , as well as to those recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to determine the association and effect estimates, data on allele and genotype frequency from selected papers were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The protocols in our current study include paper selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analysis referred to our previous studies [14][15][16][17][18] , and we also used the checklist of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) to guide the protocols in our study 19 . A completed PRISMA checklist for the current study is available (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12016782) 98 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effort to attain our goal, potentially relevant papers were identified and collected from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science to calculate odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) using either fixed or random effect model. A checklist adapted from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the design of our previous meta-analyses [15][16][17][18][19][20] were used to guide the meta-analysis protocols in our present study 21 . See Reporting guidelines for a completed PRISMA checklist for this study 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%