2003
DOI: 10.1177/1049731502250402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment of High-Risk Sexual Behavior and Self-Presentation Concerns

Abstract: Objective: This project developed a new questionnaire format to facilitate the self-report of risky sexual behavior. This new format asked participants whether they or their partners initiated various sexual behaviors. It was predicted that allowing respondents to attribute their behaviors to others would facilitate the disclosure of risky sex. Method: College student participants were randomly assigned to one of two sexual behavior questionnaire formats (Initiation vs Standard). Results: Individuals assigned … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A closer look at the existing empirical literature supports this conjecture. The few studies that explicitly considered questions on the self-reporting of sexual partners were consistent with what we found here: there was either no difference in reporting associated with mode of administration (Boekeloo et al, 1994; Durant & Carey, 2000; Scandell, Klinkenberg, Hawkes, & Spriggs, 2003) or higher reporting in the FTFI (Solstad & Davidsen, 1993). The implication would seem to be that both modes produce consistent estimates, so the decision should be based on other grounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A closer look at the existing empirical literature supports this conjecture. The few studies that explicitly considered questions on the self-reporting of sexual partners were consistent with what we found here: there was either no difference in reporting associated with mode of administration (Boekeloo et al, 1994; Durant & Carey, 2000; Scandell, Klinkenberg, Hawkes, & Spriggs, 2003) or higher reporting in the FTFI (Solstad & Davidsen, 1993). The implication would seem to be that both modes produce consistent estimates, so the decision should be based on other grounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This concurs with previous studies in which similar and even higher rates of RSB were demonstrated among both males and females (e.g., Hawkins et al, 1995;Poulson et al, 1998;Scandell et al, 2003). Nevertheless, the findings gained in this study demonstrate an association between RSB and gender, as well as gender differences in RSB, with males reporting higher rates of engagement in RSB during the previous year and receiving higher total RSB scores than females did.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some researchers have demonstrated that engagement in RSB is more common among males than among females and that females tend to be more selective and to exercise more caution in their sexual behavior (Hawkins, Gray, & Hawkins, 1995;Poulson, Eppler, Satterwhite, Wuensch, & Bass, 1998). Other researchers, however, have indicated the opposite trend, namely that the rate of females' engagement in RSB is higher than that of males (Scandell, Klinkenberg, Hawkes, & Spriggs, 2003). Furthermore, the reason for the gender diversity in RSB has not yet been fully elucidated.…”
Section: Risky Sexual Behavior Among Males and Femalesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alcohol use prior to sexual intercourse is associated with decreased condom use, particularly with casual partners (LaBrie et al 2005). In sum, among those college students who experience sexuallyrelated negative consequences, risk factors include multiple sexual partners in a short time span, inconsistent condom use, and heavy alcohol consumption (Desiderato and Crawford 1995;Hingson et al 2005;Scandell et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%