2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of center of mass and center of pressure during quiet stance: Current applications and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the UCM Ratio is above zero is interpreted as an indicator for the control of the RV [ 42 , 43 ], which, in our case, is the CoM. Although it has been suggested that the CoM is a controlled variable, and especially in the postural studies [ 53 ], it is hard to verify this experimentally. Scholz et al [ 54 ] showed that, during balance recovery, participants tended to re-establish the position of the CoM rather than those of the joint configurations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The fact that the UCM Ratio is above zero is interpreted as an indicator for the control of the RV [ 42 , 43 ], which, in our case, is the CoM. Although it has been suggested that the CoM is a controlled variable, and especially in the postural studies [ 53 ], it is hard to verify this experimentally. Scholz et al [ 54 ] showed that, during balance recovery, participants tended to re-establish the position of the CoM rather than those of the joint configurations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, as during the unassisted condition the rollator simulator was not used, the analysis of the COP feet provides a consistent insight of the effort of the human body to regulate the COM within the base of support during the transition phase from seat-off to a stable stance for the comparison of the two support conditions and the unassisted condition. As the COP reflects the neuromuscular response to control the COM within the base of support ( Sloot et al, 2020 ; Richmond et al, 2021 ), the findings of the study help in understanding how the body constrains the COM within the base of support during assisted and unassisted standing up and sitting down. This was shown in this study by the reduced COP feet length and sway area with increasing support, implying that less effort of an individual was needed to control the COM within the base of support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as the preparation process before lifting the buttocks of the chair is highly important for the stability of the subsequent standing up movement ( Goulart and Valls-Solé 1999 ), we analyzed the relative seat-off timing to quantify if the variations in support led to changes in the preparation time. Because the center of pressure (COP) reflects the neuromuscular response to control the center of mass (COM) within the base of support, it has an important role in terms of maintaining stability ( Sloot et al, 2020 ; Richmond et al, 2021 ). Therefore, we analyzed throughout the standing up and sitting down the total 2D horizontal COP (COP feet ) path length of the feet ( Pinsault and Vuillerme 2009 ; Ringhof and Stein 2018 ) and the sway area ( Quijoux et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, previous evaluation of postural stability by the results of clinical tests was supplemented by instrumental measurements of the amplitude and frequency of CG and COP oscillations in the anterior-postural (COP_АР) and medial-lateral directions (COP_ML) using stabilographic devices [ 28 , 30 ]. Later it was established that COP_AP is the most sensitive index of the fear of falling and situational anxiety [ 32 ].…”
Section: Stabilometric Measurements Of Postural Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%