2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients

Abstract: Level III, case control study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
22
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In these elderly patients, early postoperative weight bearing often leads to impaired mobility and delayed weight bearing and may further weaken the bone, culminating in a dissatisfactory result. 1 , 3 Although numerous studies of fixation with the IT and PFNA-II that were primarily based on short-term (≤1 year) evaluation indicators such as the operation time, length of stay, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and pain demonstrated that both nails achieve good functional and radiographic outcomes, 3 , 12 14 few studies have compared both nails in the management of IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1.1-A2.3) in terms of long-term functional and radiographic outcomes in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Thus, conclusive data regarding which implant is more advantageous are lacking in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In these elderly patients, early postoperative weight bearing often leads to impaired mobility and delayed weight bearing and may further weaken the bone, culminating in a dissatisfactory result. 1 , 3 Although numerous studies of fixation with the IT and PFNA-II that were primarily based on short-term (≤1 year) evaluation indicators such as the operation time, length of stay, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and pain demonstrated that both nails achieve good functional and radiographic outcomes, 3 , 12 14 few studies have compared both nails in the management of IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1.1-A2.3) in terms of long-term functional and radiographic outcomes in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Thus, conclusive data regarding which implant is more advantageous are lacking in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFNA-II can minimize the risk of these implant-related complications and provide angular and rotational stability. This is especially important in osteoporotic bone and unstable IFFs of elderly high-risk patients, allowing early mobilization and weight bearing on the affected limbs [ 15 18 ]. The literature reports that the biomechanical stability of PFNA-II is superior to that of DHS [ 17 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these facts mentioned earlier and also as a part of our work on the synthesis of bioactive lead compounds, the title compounds were designed by introducing cyclopropane and 1,2,3‐thiadiazole pharmacophore into 1,2,4‐triazole scaffold. Some 1,2,4‐triazole derivatives were synthesized and characterized by 1 H‐NMR, MS, and elemental analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%