1965
DOI: 10.1080/0013188650070205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ascertainment of Educationally Subnormal Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These questions lead us to two further and crucial points. The first is that the actual criteria used (or the factors involved) in allocation to different provisions are not clearly known and may vary from one local authority to another (Presland, 1970;Williams, 1965). It might well be that the differences obtained are due to the fact that particular types of children with particular circumstances are allocated to each provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These questions lead us to two further and crucial points. The first is that the actual criteria used (or the factors involved) in allocation to different provisions are not clearly known and may vary from one local authority to another (Presland, 1970;Williams, 1965). It might well be that the differences obtained are due to the fact that particular types of children with particular circumstances are allocated to each provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is the awareness of environmental ' handicaps ' or ' deficiency ' as a concomitant if not the cause of ' subnormality.' While, again, there is a danger of confusing ' deficiency ' with ' relativity ' this warns against an emphasis on schooling when the problem is ' societal ' : witness the remarkable difference in social class distribution between ESN children with and without organic defects (Williams and Gruber, 1967;. However, all this is not to detract attention from those relatively few cases (Rutter et al, 1970) who display organic deficiencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%