2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor – More than a simple feedback inhibitor of AhR signaling: Clues for its role in inflammation and cancer

Abstract: The aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) was first described as a specific competitive repressor of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activity based on its ability to dimerize with the AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) and through direct competition of AhR/ARNT and AhRR/ARNT complexes for binding to dioxin-responsive elements (DREs). Like AhR, AhRR belongs to the basic Helix-Loop-Helix/Per-ARNT-Sim (bHLH/PAS) protein family but lacks functional ligand-binding and transactivation domains. Transient transfecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(131 reference statements)
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AhRR is known to negatively regulate AhR signaling via its inhibitory transactivation . Moreover, AhRR have anti‐inflammatory activity associated with tumor suppressive …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AhRR is known to negatively regulate AhR signaling via its inhibitory transactivation . Moreover, AhRR have anti‐inflammatory activity associated with tumor suppressive …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the skin, most of the cell types in the epidermis, as well as fibroblasts in the dermis, and immune cells are known to express AhR and AhRR. 8,9 In this study, AhR and AhRR expressions in the epidermis was evaluated because epidermis is directly exposed to the environment. Furthermore, the number of fibroblasts and immune cells are relatively small and variable.…”
Section: Changes Of Ahr and Ahrrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former, the role of the HIF‐1 complex consisting of HIF‐1α or ‐2α, a transactivating subunit that is inducible (eg, in response to hypoxia), and HIF1β, a regulatory subunit that is often considered as constitutively expressed and unaffected by hypoxia, has been well documented in tumor progression,11 tumor‐stroma interaction,12 metastasis,10 etc. In the latter, the AhR/ARNT complex binds to dioxin‐responsive elements (DREs) to induce transcription of target genes that encode drug‐metabolizing enzymes (eg, cytochrome P450 1A1) as well as proteins governing cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, which most likely facilitates carcinogenesis and tumor promotion 16. However, ARNT also forms a complex with AhR repressor (AhRR), which directly competes AhR/ARNT for binding to DREs and thus acts as a tumor suppressor 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, the AhR/ARNT complex binds to dioxin‐responsive elements (DREs) to induce transcription of target genes that encode drug‐metabolizing enzymes (eg, cytochrome P450 1A1) as well as proteins governing cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, which most likely facilitates carcinogenesis and tumor promotion 16. However, ARNT also forms a complex with AhR repressor (AhRR), which directly competes AhR/ARNT for binding to DREs and thus acts as a tumor suppressor 16. Moreover, ARNT might also promote survival and proliferation of tumor cells, independently of its roles in AhR and HIF signaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies suggest that coal tar may improve the skin barrier by inducing the AHR (aryl-hydrocarbon receptor) gene [22]. Interestingly, cigarette smoke also influences the methylation of AHRR (aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor) [23] indicating a possible link between biological pathways influenced by cigarette smoke and those related to eczema. Existing studies report a protective effect of maternal gestational smoking for eczema in offspring [16, 18], null effects [24] and increased risks [3, 25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%