2020
DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Artificialization of Mind and World

Abstract: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to renewed ambitions of developing artificial general intelligence. Alongside this has been a resurgence in the development of virtual and augmented reality (V/AR) technologies, which are viewed as “disruptive” technologies and the computing platforms of the future. V/AR effectively bring the digital world of machines, robots, and artificial agents to our senses while entailing the transposition of human activity and presence into the digital world … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several analyses focus on the issue of Imago Dei; it is applied both to how we can understand the human condition when confronted with developments in AI coming close to the human mind, and to what extent Imago Dei interprets our intelligent creations, or whether personhood and what is associated with it can be attributed to machines too. Some studies point to a necessary revision of our theological anthropological categories, after observing the contrast between us and the machines (Barbour 1999; Herzfeld 2002, 2007; Brittain 2020); or the complex issue conceiving alterity in our relationship with these intelligent systems (Chaudhary 2020; Burdett 2020; La Parra 2021). The impression is that many things change when we consider these new arrivals or fresh developments and applications in AI; their status appears as ambivalent, or less clear, mid‐way between the mechanic thing and the real person able to interact and even to reveal some intention.…”
Section: Where We Are In the Theological Study Of Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analyses focus on the issue of Imago Dei; it is applied both to how we can understand the human condition when confronted with developments in AI coming close to the human mind, and to what extent Imago Dei interprets our intelligent creations, or whether personhood and what is associated with it can be attributed to machines too. Some studies point to a necessary revision of our theological anthropological categories, after observing the contrast between us and the machines (Barbour 1999; Herzfeld 2002, 2007; Brittain 2020); or the complex issue conceiving alterity in our relationship with these intelligent systems (Chaudhary 2020; Burdett 2020; La Parra 2021). The impression is that many things change when we consider these new arrivals or fresh developments and applications in AI; their status appears as ambivalent, or less clear, mid‐way between the mechanic thing and the real person able to interact and even to reveal some intention.…”
Section: Where We Are In the Theological Study Of Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All forms of XR (i.e. VR, MR and AG) lead to some form of ‘technologization of human perception’ (Chaudhary, 2019, p. 454). Arguably the most well know from of XR is VR, which is a ‘high‐end user‐computer interface that involves real‐time simulation and interactions through multiple sensorial channels’ (Burdea and Coiffet, 2003, p. 3).…”
Section: Extended Reality: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaudhary M Y uses the background difference method to identify and detect moving targets. The advantage of this method is that it is not sensitive to light conversion and has a strong anti-noise ability [13]. The accuracy of target recognition can be guaranteed, but it is undesirable to reduce the real-time performance of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%