2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Architecture of Why2-Atlas: A Coach for Qualitative Physics Essay Writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of dialogue-based interaction on learning is further supported by studies that show that prompting students with little or no content in the tutoring interface is associated with an increase in the learning curves and that forcing them to generate words rather than simply reading them promotes subsequent recall of those words (Slamecka & Graf, 1978). There are at least two successful tutors that utilize conversational interface; Autotutor (A. C. Graesser et al, 2004) -a computer literacy tutor that simulates conversational dialogue and Atlas Andes and Why2 (Gertner & VanLehn, 2000;VanLehn K. et al, 2002) -a set of physics tutors that attempt to comprehend natural language and plan dialogue moves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of dialogue-based interaction on learning is further supported by studies that show that prompting students with little or no content in the tutoring interface is associated with an increase in the learning curves and that forcing them to generate words rather than simply reading them promotes subsequent recall of those words (Slamecka & Graf, 1978). There are at least two successful tutors that utilize conversational interface; Autotutor (A. C. Graesser et al, 2004) -a computer literacy tutor that simulates conversational dialogue and Atlas Andes and Why2 (Gertner & VanLehn, 2000;VanLehn K. et al, 2002) -a set of physics tutors that attempt to comprehend natural language and plan dialogue moves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Often, the intermediate cognitive steps are first identified using empirical methods such as cognitive task analysis. Some cognitive intelligent tutoring systems (CITS) use language based interfaces (Evens et al, 2001; Ros'e C., Litman D., Behembe D., Forbes K., & VanLehn K., 2003; VanLehn K., Jordan P. W., Ros'e C., & Wilson R., 2002). Both standard CITS 8 and those with language-based interfaces (Corbett, McLaughlin, & Scarpinatto, 2000;A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to employ an open-domain parser in combination with domain-specific knowledge. CARMEL (Rosé, 2000) is a natural language understanding component that has been used in multiple dialogue systems (Zinn et al, 2000;Litman, 2004;VanLehn et al, 2002). CARMEL uses a semantic interpretation framework that performs semantic interpretation with semantic constructor functions during syntactic parsing.…”
Section: Language Understanding In Tutorial Dialogue Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's tutorial dialogue systems engage in natural language dialogue in support of tasks such as solving qualitative physics problems (VanLehn et al, 2002), understanding computer architecture and physics (Graesser et al, 2004), and predicting behavior of electrical circuits (Dzikovska et al, 2011). Although these systems differ in many ways, they have an important commonality: in order to semantically interpret user dialogue utterances, these systems ground the utterances in a fixed domain description that is an integral part of the engineered system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITSPOKE is a fully automated spoken dialogue tutoring system that is built on top of the Why2-Atlas text-based tutoring system (VanLehn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Itspoke: Original and Wizarded System Versionsmentioning
confidence: 99%