2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9081-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A natural language intelligent tutoring system for training pathologists: implementation and evaluation

Abstract: Introduction-We developed and evaluated a Natural Language Interface (NLI) for an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) in Diagnostic Pathology. The system teaches residents to examine pathologic slides and write accurate pathology reports while providing immediate feedback on errors they make in their slide review and diagnostic reports. Residents can ask for help at any point in the case, and will receive context-specific feedback.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences in learning gains were observed between groups. These findings replicate results demonstrated in previous studies of our tutoring system (Crowley et al, 2007; El Saadawi et al, 2008; El Saadawi et al, 2010). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No significant differences in learning gains were observed between groups. These findings replicate results demonstrated in previous studies of our tutoring system (Crowley et al, 2007; El Saadawi et al, 2008; El Saadawi et al, 2010). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…ITSs support “leaning-by-doing,” and provide individualized support, point out errors, and organize content to cater to the needs of the individual when the teacher has limited time to spend (Corbett, Koedinger, & Hadley, 2002; Koedinger & Aleven, 2007; VanLehn, 2006, 2011). Although there is a great potential for the use of medical ITS, few of these systems have been fully developed (e.g., Azevedo & Lajoie, 1998; Clancey, 1987; Crowley & Medvedeva, 2006; Lajoie & Azevedo, 2006; Lajoie, 2009; Maries & Kumar, 2008; Obradovich et al, 2000; Rogers, 1995; Sharples et al, 2000; Smith et al, 1998), a smaller number of which have been empirically evaluated (Crowley et al, 2007; El Saadawi et al, 2008; Woo et al, 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another research field with similar needs is the development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) based on natural language interaction [D' Mello et al 2007]. In this area several systems have been developed to support students in their study activities; for example in reading and speaking a first or second language [Ferreira and Atkinson 2009; Amaral and Meurers 2011], in providing feedback on misconceptions regarding several topics, like physics [Litman et al 2004], and medicine [El Saadawi et al 2008]. However, in this field the research is more focused on providing appropriate feedback to students and the challenge is to provide detailed topic models [Griffiths and Steyvers 2007].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of these properties suggests that computers are a technology platform that will provide valuable resources for neuroanatomy instruction. Recent generations of computer systems display graphical material particularly well (LONI, 2013; Surgical Planning Laboratory, 2013), and the capabilities of computers for information management should provide good support for self-study (Saadawi et al, 2008; Koedinger & Corbett, 2006). Despite this promise, most reviews of computer-based instructional applications in the biomedical sciences are not enthusiastic about the progress that has been made (J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%