2017
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Archaeological Study of Sacrifice

Abstract: Sacrifice is one of the most common manifestations of human religious thought and behavior, yet archaeology has only recently begun to devote significant attention to the practice. This article reviews the diverse ways in which archaeologists have studied sacrifice and how work might proceed in the future. Both animal and human sacrifice are considered, along with the question of whether these two manifestations of ritual killing are significantly distinct. After examining how sacrifice can be identified in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sacrifice without a recipient: defining retainer sacrifice The death of the slave girl forms a more or less obligatory part of any discussion of the reality of human sacrifice in Viking Age funerary rituals (Duczko 2004;Hraundal 2013;McLeod 2018;Näsström 2001;Price 2008;Steinsland 2005), and yet it is not without its challenges. In theory, sacrificial schema tend to be directed towards a higher power, designed to alleviate, obtain or avoid certain outcomes (Bourdillon 1980;Green 1999;Hubert & Mauss 1964;Schwartz 2017). The killing of a companion in a burial ritual falls under a slightly different heading which does not immediately fit with the classical definition of making sacred that the word sacrifice literally means (Hubert & Mauss 1964).…”
Section: Gendered Biases and Academic Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sacrifice without a recipient: defining retainer sacrifice The death of the slave girl forms a more or less obligatory part of any discussion of the reality of human sacrifice in Viking Age funerary rituals (Duczko 2004;Hraundal 2013;McLeod 2018;Näsström 2001;Price 2008;Steinsland 2005), and yet it is not without its challenges. In theory, sacrificial schema tend to be directed towards a higher power, designed to alleviate, obtain or avoid certain outcomes (Bourdillon 1980;Green 1999;Hubert & Mauss 1964;Schwartz 2017). The killing of a companion in a burial ritual falls under a slightly different heading which does not immediately fit with the classical definition of making sacred that the word sacrifice literally means (Hubert & Mauss 1964).…”
Section: Gendered Biases and Academic Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple human-to-human reasons for performing rituals involving cattle, sheep, and goats. The assumed connection to divinities or “superhuman entities” is a cultural imposition (Schwartz 2017 ). Divine transcendence is not a universal cognitive category.…”
Section: Livestock Cattle In Ritual Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent foci for studies of ritual were feasting (Anderson and Cook ; Dietrich, Notroff, and Schmidt ; Gamble ; Hansen ) and sacrifice (Cheung et al. ; Schwartz ). Many archaeologists in 2017 explored alternate concepts of time and the role of memory in past societies (Hamilakis ; Haskell and Stawski ; Mixter ; Mixter and Henry ; Morehart ; Overholtzer and Bolnick ; Pool and Loughlin ; Sinamai ; Van Dyke ; VanValkenburgh ; Yao ).…”
Section: Individuals and Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%