1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00431579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of total hydrocarbon flame ionization detectors to the analysis of hydrocarbon mixtures from motor vehicles, with and without catalytic emission control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are minor differences in response for each hydrocarbon in each system when compared to propane. There are also potential matrix problems due to the presence of oxygen in the FID (13,14). The summation of the GC speciation may not reflect the presence of compounds with high molecular weight (above Cn), resulting in a low total hydrocarbon quantitation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are minor differences in response for each hydrocarbon in each system when compared to propane. There are also potential matrix problems due to the presence of oxygen in the FID (13,14). The summation of the GC speciation may not reflect the presence of compounds with high molecular weight (above Cn), resulting in a low total hydrocarbon quantitation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product gases from the reactor are sampled at t ¼ 1 hour to determine product formation and TOF values via gas chromatography (GC) (HP 5890, flame ionization (FID) detector) at low conversions (<10%C 2 H 4 conversion). Concentrations and retention times of product gases were determined using calibrated hydrocarbon gas mixtures, propionaldehyde, and standard literature FID sensitivity factors and GC techniques (47,48). Ultrahigh purity (UHP) H 2 was used as received.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreases started at lower molecular weights for the more polar aromatics. The largest differences were seen on the analysis with the bench FID instrument (3).…”
Section: Response Of the Fid To Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 95%