1990
DOI: 10.1021/es00076a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution of apparent underestimation in flame ionization detector hydrocarbon analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There can be variations in the response of an FID to various HCs as a result of HC class (i.e., the type of carbon bond or the degree of oxidation) and flame condition, but these errors are generally less than 10%. 38 The THD was calibrated…”
Section: Micrometeorological Thc Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be variations in the response of an FID to various HCs as a result of HC class (i.e., the type of carbon bond or the degree of oxidation) and flame condition, but these errors are generally less than 10%. 38 The THD was calibrated…”
Section: Micrometeorological Thc Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have traditionally been quantified by gas chromatography (GC) using flame ionization detection (FID), a very tedious procedure. Recently traditional GC/FID techniques have been shown to significantly under‐detect higher molecular weight hydrocarbons [Sigsby et al, 1990]. An automated “on‐line” sampling and sample concentrations system for GC measurement of trace organics has been described by Rudolph et al [1990].…”
Section: Reductant Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%