The application of targeted nanopore sequencing for the identification of pathogens and resistance genes in lower respiratory tract infections

Abstract

ObjectivesLower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are one of the causes of mortality among infectious diseases. Microbial cultures commonly used in clinical practice are time-consuming, have poor sensitivity to unculturable and polymicrobial patterns, and are inadequate to guide timely and accurate antibiotic therapy. We investigated the feasibility of targeted nanopore sequencing (TNPseq) for the identification of pathogen and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes across suspected patients with LRTIs. TNPseq is a novel approach, which was improved based on nanopore sequencing for the identification of bacterial and fungal infections of clinical relevance.MethodsThis prospective study recruited 146 patients suspected of having LRTIs and with a median age of 61 years. The potential pathogens in these patients were detected by both TNPseq and the traditional culture workups. We compared the performance between the two methods among 146 LRTIs-related specimens. AMR genes were also detected by TNPseq to prompt the proper utilization of antibiotics.ResultsAt least one pathogen was detected in 133 (91.1%) samples by TNPseq, but only 37 (25.3%) samples contained positive isolates among 146 cultured specimens. TNPseq possessed higher sensitivity than the conventional culture method (91.1 vs. 25.3%, P < 0.001) in identifying pathogens. It detected more samples with bacterial infections (P < 0.001) and mixed infections (P < 0.001) compared with the clinical culture tests. The most frequent AMR gene identified by TNPseq was blaTEM (n = 29), followed by blaSHV (n = 4), blaKPC (n = 2), blaCTX−M (n = 2), and mecA (n = 2). Furthermore, TNPseq discovered five possible multi-drug resistance specimens.ConclusionTNPseq is efficient to identify pathogens early, thus assisting physicians to conduct timely and precise treatment for patients with suspected LRTIs.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Nanopore Sequencing for DetectingMycobacterium tuberculosisand Drug-Resistant Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…To facilitate our analysis, studies were classified into two categories: those focusing on the detection of MTB (Table 1) and those focusing on the detection of DR-MTB (Table 2). Among the 32 articles, 13 articles related to MTB detection only [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] ,15 articles focused on DR-MTB detection only [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] , while 4 articles examined both [46][47][48][49] .…”

A growing battlefield in the war against biofilm-induced antimicrobial resistance: insights from reviews on antibiotic resistance

“…Although studies are limited to biomarkers that are unique to bacterial biofilms, especially those present in multiple bacterial species, but detection of biofilm matrix components (such as cellulose (Perumal et al, 2021)) and QS signal profiling might discover potential biomarkers. Other novel approaches, including targeted nanopore sequencing (TNPseq) (Zhang et al, 2022a); metagenomics (Taşet al, 2021); and nanoparticles (Funari and Shen, 2022).…”

Nanopore-Based Metagenomic Sequencing in Respiratory Tract Infection: A Developing Diagnostic Platform

“…NPS has been shown to be an accurate and cost-effective method of diagnosing bacterial RTIs in various clinical settings [ 7 , 32 , 33 ]. Notably, a turnaround time of under 6 h (sample received to pathogen identification time) has been reported for the diagnosis of bacterial RTI [ 34 ], including data on antibiotic resistance profiles [ 35 ].…”