1983
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
688
1
214

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,531 publications
(910 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
688
1
214
Order By: Relevance
“…The data was used to determine intra-examiner systemic and random error according to Houston. 24 Systemic error was assessed using a StudentÕs t-test and random error was examined using correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data was used to determine intra-examiner systemic and random error according to Houston. 24 Systemic error was assessed using a StudentÕs t-test and random error was examined using correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard error for each cephalometric value was calculated. Student's paired t-test 15 was used to determine systematic error and P value, for these differences were not found to be significant. Pearson correlation coefficient showed a statistically significant range for the reliability of observations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An error of the method analysis was carried out in order to calculate the random error (RE) of the method, as described by Houston, 13 by repeating the cephalometric tracings on 15 randomly selected lateral cephalometric radiographs from the patient sample, within a 3 week interval. Dahlberg's formula 14 was used in order to calculate the error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%