2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/4987831
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal

Abstract: Introduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and DHS were randomly inserted into femurs on both sides and then removed. Thereafter, compression load was applied until fracture occurred; biomechanical stability of the femurs and associated fracture patterns were stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyse the effect of cementing technique, computational models were created according to average dimensions of the sub-trochanteric femoral area, using digital X-ray from patients of CHUP-ICBAS and proved from a biomechanical data control group [16]- [17]. Figure 1 a) shows a metastatic lytic lesion of the proximal left femur (subtrochanter) identified on a plain pelvic X-ray, where the patient was diagnosed with metastatic disease of a breast cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyse the effect of cementing technique, computational models were created according to average dimensions of the sub-trochanteric femoral area, using digital X-ray from patients of CHUP-ICBAS and proved from a biomechanical data control group [16]- [17]. Figure 1 a) shows a metastatic lytic lesion of the proximal left femur (subtrochanter) identified on a plain pelvic X-ray, where the patient was diagnosed with metastatic disease of a breast cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low bone density, the deterioration of the microarchitecture, and the increase in frailty may result in a decrease in the mechanical resistance of this tissue, predisposing it to fractures due to low energy traumas, and the fracture of the proximal end of the femur (PEF) has the highest morbidity and mortality rates. [1][2][3] The surgical treatment of these fractures aims to give the patients conditions to return to their activities. There are several recommended treatments, such as intramedullary tutors, cannulated screws (CSs) and/or the sliding tube plate (STP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of implants can cause greater local fragility and, with this, possible fractures of the PEF, especially in patients with low bone quality. 3,6,7 Therefore, evaluating the maximum load, energy and displacement necessary for fracture occurrence in synthetic femur models, after the removal of the CSs and the performance of the reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different combined positions, through a static bending test simulating a fall on the trochanter, can provide results that determine the development of an alternative technique in the solution of cases in which removing the synthesis is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal in treating such fractures is to allow the patient to return to normal activities as soon as possible by using fixation of the fracture either through rods, plates and/or screws, or arthroplasty of the hip, to reduce the possibility of complications associated to patient immobility. 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthesis implant removal is indicated in cases of persistent pain in the gluteal and thigh region caused by the prominence of the synthetic material, implant failure, or infection. 2 , 3 After proximal femur fractures are healed, removing the implants can cause complications such as possible fractures of the femoral neck or intertrochanteric region. 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%