The amygdalostriatal projections in the monkey. An anterograde tracing study

Russchen, F. T.; Bakst, I.; Amaral, David G.; Price, Joseph L.

doi:10.1016/0006-8993(85)90530-x

Cited by 359 publications

(234 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

207

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Such findings resonate with anatomical and histochemical studies in primates that indicate that ventral parts of putamen share many of the cytoarchitectonic characteristics of nucleus accumbens, as well as sharing similar inputs (Russchen et al, 1985;Selemon and Goldmanrakic, 1985;.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision Making

Bray¹,

Rangel²,

Shimojo³

et al. 2008

J. Neurosci.

167

190

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In outcome-specific transfer, pavlovian cues that are predictive of specific outcomes bias action choice toward actions associated with those outcomes. This transfer occurs despite no explicit training of the instrumental actions in the presence of pavlovian cues. The neural substrates of this effect in humans are unknown. To address this, we scanned 23 human subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they made choices between different liquid food rewards in the presence of pavlovian cues previously associated with one of these outcomes. We found behavioral evidence of outcome-specific transfer effects in our subjects, as well as differential blood oxygenation level-dependent activity in a region of ventrolateral putamen when subjects chose, respectively, actions consistent and inconsistent with the pavlovian-predicted outcome. Our results suggest that choosing an action incompatible with a pavlovian-predicted outcome might require the inhibition of feasible but nonselected action-outcome associations. The results of this study are relevant for understanding how marketing actions can affect consumer choice behavior as well as for how environmental cues can influence drugseeking behavior in addiction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision Making

Bray¹,

Rangel²,

Shimojo³

et al. 2008

J. Neurosci.

167

190

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…BLA has elaborate and reciprocal connections with prefrontal cortex (58) and projects to the nucleus accumbens in the ventral striatum (59,60), endorsing a role for the amygdala in shaping how these circuits process the value of rewards during decisionmaking. We speculate that mirroring of reward values for self and others by BLA serves to adjust the gain of neuronal signals mediating social decisions in the brain.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neural mechanisms of social decision-making in the primate amygdala

Chang

Fagan

Toda

et al. 2015

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

129

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social decisions require evaluation of costs and benefits to oneself and others. Long associated with emotion and vigilance, the amygdala has recently been implicated in both decision-making and social behavior. The amygdala signals reward and punishment, as well as facial expressions and the gaze of others. Amygdala damage impairs social interactions, and the social neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) influences human social decisions, in part, by altering amygdala function. Here we show in monkeys playing a modified dictator game, in which one individual can donate or withhold rewards from another, that basolateral amygdala (BLA) neurons signaled social preferences both across trials and across days. BLA neurons mirrored the value of rewards delivered to self and others when monkeys were free to choose but not when the computer made choices for them. We also found that focal infusion of OT unilaterally into BLA weakly but significantly increased both the frequency of prosocial decisions and attention to recipients for context-specific prosocial decisions, endorsing the hypothesis that OT regulates social behavior, in part, via amygdala neuromodulation. Our findings demonstrate both neurophysiological and neuroendocrinological connections between primate amygdala and social decisions.amygdala | social decision | value mirroring | oxytocin | hierarchical modeling H ow we treat others impacts not only their well-being but our own. Human society depends on cooperation, charity, and altruism, as well as institutions to regulate selfish biases. In humans, these behaviors involve perspective-taking, empathy, and theory of mind (1, 2), and the rudiments of these capacities appear to mediate complex social behavior in animals (3). Recent research has sketched a rough outline of the neural circuits that contribute to complex social behavior (4, 5). These comprise a set of domaingeneral brain areas, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum, that process information about reward and punishment and contribute to decision-making, and a set of specialized areas, including the temporoparietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex, that process specifically social information (4, 6). How social and nonsocial signals in these circuits are integrated to mediate decisions with respect to others remains imperfectly understood, in part, due to the indirect nature of hemodynamic signals measured in human neuroimaging experiments that constitute the bulk of this research. Recent advances in the development of neurophysiological and neuropharmacological models of social decision-making, however, permit more direct inquiry into the neural mechanisms mediating other-regarding behavior (7-11).The amygdala, especially the basolateral division (BLA), has been implicated in both decision-making and social perception, inviting the possibility that it contributes to decision-making with respect to others (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). This set of nuclei is well known for contributions to emotional experience and expression, especia...

show abstract

“…The VS also contains many pallidal cells and their dendritic arbors that invade this ventral forebrain territory (see section Ventral pallidum). Finally, and of particular importance, is the fact that while both the dorsal and VS receive input from the cortex, thalamus, and brainstem, the VS alone receives a dense projection from the amygdala and hippocampus (Friedman et al, 2002;Fudge et al, 2002;Russchen et al, 1985). (Figure 3).…”

Section: Organization Of the Vsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall, the basal nucleus and the magnocellular division of the accessory basal nucleus are the main source of inputs to the VS (Fudge et al, 2002;Russchen et al, 1985). The lateral nucleus has a relatively minor input to the VS.…”

Section: Connections Of the Vsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Reward Circuit: Linking Primate Anatomy and Human Imaging

Haber

Knutson

2009

Neuropsychopharmacol

3,153

193

2,859

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although cells in many brain regions respond to reward, the cortical-basal ganglia circuit is at the heart of the reward system. The key structures in this network are the anterior cingulate cortex, the orbital prefrontal cortex, the ventral striatum, the ventral pallidum, and the midbrain dopamine neurons. In addition, other structures, including the dorsal prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and lateral habenular nucleus, and specific brainstem structures such as the pedunculopontine nucleus, and the raphe nucleus, are key components in regulating the reward circuit. Connectivity between these areas forms a complex neural network that mediates different aspects of reward processing. Advances in neuroimaging techniques allow better spatial and temporal resolution. These studies now demonstrate that human functional and structural imaging results map increasingly close to primate anatomy.

show abstract

The amygdalostriatal projections in the monkey. An anterograde tracing study

Cited by 359 publications

References 51 publications

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision Making

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision Making

Neural mechanisms of social decision-making in the primate amygdala

The Reward Circuit: Linking Primate Anatomy and Human Imaging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About