2011
DOI: 10.1375/prp.5.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aid Triangle: Recognising the Human Dynamics of Dominance, Justice and Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The priority of interactional justice over other forms of justice in predicting empowerment is JOURNAL OF PACIFIC RIM PSYCHOLOGY striking (Figure 2), supporting prior observations that interpersonal harmony may be more important than distributive justice in collectivistic societies (Beugr, 2002;Crosby, 1984) such as the Philippines. Consistent with other research (Carr, et al, 1998;MacLachlan, et al, 2010;McAuliffe, et al, 2009), higher levels of distributive justice were related positively to all aspects of empowerment amongst Filipino aid employees Figure 2). This adds to the evidence linking justice with satisfaction, effectiveness and productivity (McAuliffe, et al, 2009;McWha, 2010).…”
Section: Key Findingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The priority of interactional justice over other forms of justice in predicting empowerment is JOURNAL OF PACIFIC RIM PSYCHOLOGY striking (Figure 2), supporting prior observations that interpersonal harmony may be more important than distributive justice in collectivistic societies (Beugr, 2002;Crosby, 1984) such as the Philippines. Consistent with other research (Carr, et al, 1998;MacLachlan, et al, 2010;McAuliffe, et al, 2009), higher levels of distributive justice were related positively to all aspects of empowerment amongst Filipino aid employees Figure 2). This adds to the evidence linking justice with satisfaction, effectiveness and productivity (McAuliffe, et al, 2009;McWha, 2010).…”
Section: Key Findingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Absolute and relative indicators of thriving at work might therefore be respectively conceptualised as Reciprocity (Ba fair day's work for a fair day's pay^) and as being informed by Upward Comparison, namely, comparing one's position on the pay ladder at work (Carr 2003;Harris et al 2008). Remunerative justice may be especially salient at lower ends of the wage distribution, where it makes more of a noticeable difference (to quality of life, and work life) and is a more salient element in the psychological contract between employer and employee (Arrowsmith and Parker 2013;Coyle-Shapiro and Parzefall 2008;MacLachlan et al 2012). Pay justice (reciprocity and upward comparison) was therefore measured in this study.…”
Section: Anti-poverty Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with Social Dominance Theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), the dominant myth around Private Enterprise was supported both by the Private Sector in-group whose economic interest it undoubtedly served, but also by the Public Sector out-group, whose economic interest it arguably undermined. Together these findings shed light on how justice, dominance and identity may interact and impact on societal motivation (MacLachlan, Carr, & McAuliffe, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%