The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model

Byun, Dae–Ho

doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00071-9

Cited by 220 publications

(141 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

126

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The weights were determined through a meeting that one of the researchers had with the purchasing and environmental manager of the company. The pair-wise comparisons inherent to the AHP application was performed as a team exercise and the final decision was reached by consensus [63][64][65]. The three academics also answered the questionnaire but only with the purpose of testing it.…”

Section: Stage 2-determination Of Indicator Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposal of a Sustainability Index for the Automotive Industry

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In a scenario of increasing globalization, sustainable development has emerged as an attractive and strategic issue for both countries and individual organizations and their supply chains. Companies have faced different challenges in seeking to combine the best economic performance with increased social and environmental responsibility. Monitoring sustainability is essential for decision-making and management of activities that comprise an organization's system processes. Evaluation can be performed using indices or a set of indicators. In addition to increasing organizational effectiveness and improving competitiveness, customer service and profitability, it is also a crucial influence on the development of business sustainability. This paper proposes a sustainability index that provides companies with information about their level of economic, social and environmental sustainability, showing their performance at both individual and supply chain level. The importance of the indicators is assessed by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology applied to a case study of a supply chain in the automotive industry. The various stages experienced during the construction of the index are also shown. The final results achieved are then presented and discussed in light of the objectives. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2015, 7 2114

show abstract

Section: Stage 2-determination Of Indicator Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposal of a Sustainability Index for the Automotive Industry

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Goffin et al [6] contend that, in addition to costs, quality and delivery, the criteria for supplier evaluation and selection should include technical capability, financial capacity, after-sale services and strategies. Byun [7] used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to develop a model for evaluating and selecting new automobiles so that consumers could make optimal purchase decisions and ensure that the best consumer services could be provided when there is business competition. Bharadwaj [8] stated the following: (1) if enterprises select qualified suppliers that can satisfy their needs, their competitiveness will be strengthened; (2) otherwise, delivery and supply could be delayed, resulting in reputational and financial losses.…”

Section: Criteria For Supplier Evaluation and Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decision-Making Model for Evaluating and Selecting Suppliers for the Sustainable Operation and Development of Enterprises in the Aerospace Industry

Lin

Hung

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Due to rigorous quality requirements and high unit prices, the manufacture of machines used in the aerospace industry is characterized by a high entry threshold, high risk and a long payback period. A good decision-making model for evaluating and selecting suppliers is vital for sustainable enterprise development. Therefore, this study presents a new two-stage model for evaluating and selecting suppliers in the aerospace industry. In the first stage, a hierarchical structure is built with five main and 16 sub-criteria for supplier evaluation and selection following the modified Delphi method; in the second stage, the best alternative solution is selected following the analytic network process (ANP) method. Finally, this study verifies the feasibility of the above model based on the purchase of high-precision and high-cost 3D measuring tools by Aerowin Technology Corporation, which is listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The results show that the five criteria in the above model are ranked by their degree of importance, as follows: quality > cost > delivery > marketing > organizational planning. The findings of this research can be used as a reference for decision-making during the purchase of high-precision and high-priced machine tools in the aerospace industry.

show abstract

“…Daha çok hususi araç seçim ölçütleri değerlendirilerek yapılan, matematiksel ve istatiksel yöntemleri içeren çalıĢmalar mevcuttur. Hususi araç seçimi ile ilgili çalıĢmalar genellikle çok kriterli tekniklerin yalnız baĢına kullanıldığı (Ballı vd., 2007, Byun, 2001, Güngör ve ĠĢler, 2012 veya bir arada kullanıldığı melez çalıĢmalardan (Terzi vd., 2006, Yousefi ve Hadi-Vencheh, 2010 oluĢmaktadır.…”

Section: Gġrġġunclassified