2010
DOI: 10.1057/9780230294585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Afterlife of Holocaust Memory in Contemporary Literature and Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In dealing with frameworks such as these, researchers working from anthropological, historical, literary and cultural studies perspectives increasingly favour the term 'transcultural memory' (see Crownshaw 2010). As I have suggested elsewhere (Erll 2010(Erll , 2011, this term allows us to move away from the methodological nationalism, and especially the 'nation-culture bind', that has characterized much of memory studies to date, and instead to focus on those aspects of remembering and forgetting which are located between, across, and beyond what we construct as 'cultures'.…”
Section: Iii16 Global Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In dealing with frameworks such as these, researchers working from anthropological, historical, literary and cultural studies perspectives increasingly favour the term 'transcultural memory' (see Crownshaw 2010). As I have suggested elsewhere (Erll 2010(Erll , 2011, this term allows us to move away from the methodological nationalism, and especially the 'nation-culture bind', that has characterized much of memory studies to date, and instead to focus on those aspects of remembering and forgetting which are located between, across, and beyond what we construct as 'cultures'.…”
Section: Iii16 Global Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And indeed, what we are facing today is a veritable trauma industry, proliferating in public discussions, literature, film, and academia. The ethical consequences of literary trauma studies' tendency to personify texts, to conflate literary works with real people, have been considered by Hungerford (2003; for further discussion see also Crownshaw 2010).…”
Section: Iii24 Memory In Literature: the Staging Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, it was doubted whether it would be possible to convincingly justify an intergenerational transmission that would command anyone to treat someone else's experiences as their own. It was also pointed out that distinguishing between the version of history acquired, for example, from textbooks, and inherited experiences may not be feasible in practice, since, ultimately, all memory procedures depend on recalling, consciously or unconsciously, past events and on attempting to face them (Weissman 2004;Crownshaw 2010). Furthermore, indicating fundamental differences between various forms of historical reconstruction seemed unrealistic, regardless of whether such reconstructions were undertaken by a direct, "non-professional" heir of the trauma or by a professional historian; in each case, the experience of history is mediated and subject to transformations, resulting from both external factors and individual conditions (Sarlo 2005: 130).…”
Section: Postmemorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powątpiewano przede wszystkim w możliwość przekonującego udowodnienia takiej transmisji międzypokoleniowej, która kazałaby cudze przeżycia traktować jako osobiste. Wskazywano ponadto, że odróżnienie wersji historii poznanej chociażby z kart podręczników od doświadczeń odziedziczonych może się okazać niewykonalne w praktyce, skoro w ostatecznym rachunku wszystkie procedury pamięciowe polegają na przywoływaniu, świadomym bądź nie, zdarzeń z przeszłości i próbie zmierzenia się z nimi (Weissman 2004;Crownshaw, 2010). Co więcej, wskazanie zasadniczych różnic między formami rekonstrukcji historycznych wydawało się nierealne, bez względu na to, czy takie rekonstrukcje podejmuje bezpośredni, "nieprofesjonalny" spadkobierca traumy czy zawodowy historyk, gdyż w każdym przypadku doświadczenie historii jest zapośredniczone i podlega transformacjom, będącym wynikiem zarówno czynników zewnętrznych, jak i uwarunkowań indywidualnych (Sarlo 2005: 130) 8 .…”
Section: Postpamięćunclassified