The advantages of computer assistance in total knee arthroplasty

Bar, M.; Daubresse, François; Hugon, Sébastien

doi:10.3944/aott.2011.2481

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CAS significantly improves varus/valgus angle [15,17-20,47], mLDFA [16,17,21-23], mMPTA [16,17,20,21,23], femoral flexion angle [15,16,18,21,22], tibial downslope [15,18,20,22,23] and rotational alignment for the femoral and tibial components [15,16,20]. Perlick et al [25] revealed a significantly better mechanical limb axis and coronal alignment of the femoral component when CAS was used during rTKA.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty

Meijer

Stevens

Boerboom

et al. 2014

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDespite good results of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) is rising. Proper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. In rTKA most anatomical landmarks have disappeared because of extensive bone loss, making it more difficult to adequately implant the knee prosthesis. In primary TKA, computer-assisted surgery (CAS) leads to better prosthetic alignment than mechanical navigation guides. Literature about the use of CAS in rTKA is scarce though, and the effect on rotational prosthetic alignment has not been investigated yet. Hence the primary objective of this study is to compare rotational prosthetic alignment when using CAS in rTKA compared to a mechanical navigation guide. Secondary objectives are to compare prosthetic alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. It is hypothesized that CAS leads to better rotational, coronal and sagittal prosthetic alignment when used during rTKA.Methods/DesignA prospective clinical intervention study with use of a historical control group will be conducted. Forty-four patients with a minimum age of 18 to be admitted for CAS-rTKA between September 2012 and September 2015 will be included in the intervention group. Forty-four patients with a minimum age of 18 who underwent rTKA with the use of a mechanical navigation guide between January 2002 and April 2012 will form the historical control group. Both groups will be matched according to gender and type of revision prosthesis. Rotational prosthesis alignment will be evaluated using a CT-scan of the knee joint.DiscussionProper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. Several studies show a significantly positive influence of CAS on prosthetic alignment in primary TKA, but literature about the use of CAS in rTKA is limited. The purpose of this study is thus to investigate the influence of CAS during rTKA on postoperative prosthetic alignment, compared to mechanical navigation guides.Trial registrationNetherlands National Trial Register NTR3512

show abstract