BackgroundBoth minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained popularity in recent years. We conducted a qualitative and systematic review to assess the effectiveness of MIS, CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA.MethodsAn extensive computerised literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and OVIDSP was conducted. Both randomised clinical trials and controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of MIS, CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA were included. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. Effect estimates were calculated and a best-evidence synthesis was performed.ResultsFour high-quality and 14 medium-quality studies with MIS THA as study contrast, and three high-quality and four medium-quality studies with CAS THA as study contrast were included. No studies with computer-assisted MIS for THA as study contrast were identified. Strong evidence was found for a decrease in operative time and intraoperative blood loss for MIS THA, with no difference in complication rates and risk for acetabular outliers. Strong evidence exists that there is no difference in physical functioning, measured either by questionnaires or by gait analysis. Moderate evidence was found for a shorter length of hospital stay after MIS THA. Conflicting evidence was found for a positive effect of MIS THA on pain in the early postoperative period, but that effect diminished after three months postoperatively. Strong evidence was found for an increase in operative time for CAS THA, and limited evidence was found for a decrease in intraoperative blood loss. Furthermore, strong evidence was found for no difference in complication rates, as well as for a significantly lower risk for acetabular outliers.ConclusionsThe results indicate that MIS THA is a safe surgical procedure, without increases in operative time, blood loss, operative complication rates and component malposition rates. However, the beneficial effect of MIS THA on functional recovery has to be proven. The results also indicate that CAS THA, though resulting in an increase in operative time, may have a positive effect on operative blood loss and operative complication rates. More importantly, the use of CAS results in better positioning of acetabular component of the prosthesis.

No abstract

The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with haemophilia have not been compared with other patient populations. The aim of this study was to compare the results of joint replacement therapy in patients with and without haemophilia retrospectively. This is a controlled retrospective cohort study. The complications and long-term results of 21 TKAs and 6 THAs performed in 22 haemophilia patients were compared with those of 42 TKAs and 12 THAs in patients without bleeding disorders. Patients were matched for type of arthroplasty, gender, year of surgery and age. Blood loss, infection rate, revision, implant survival and function as judged by the patient were recorded. Haemarthrosis occurred in 14 (52%) of the 27 arthroplasties performed in the haemophilia patients, while four bleedings were recorded in the 54 arthroplasties in the control group (7%, P < 0.001). All bleeds occurred in TKAs. In the patient group, two infections (7%, both in TKAs) occurred compared to seven (13%, 6/7 in TKAs) in the control group (NS). In the haemophilia patients, all but one (96%) arthroplasties were still in situ at the end of follow-up, vs. 44 (81%, NS) in the control group. For TKAs, survival was 20/21 vs. 34/42 respectively (P = 0.25). Subjective function was good in 22/27 (81%; 76% in TKAs) arthroplasties in haemophilia patients, vs. 40/54 (74%; 71% in TKAs) in controls. Haemophilia patients experienced significantly more haemarthroses, but no more infections and they have an excellent implant survival compared with non-haemophilia controls.