2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adjusted Global AntiphosPholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) for risk stratification in young APS patients with acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: The aGAPSS is based upon a quantitative score and could aid risk stratifying APS patients younger than 50years for the likelihood of developing coronary thrombotic events and may guide pharmacological treatment for high-risk patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to clarify that this lack of association should not be considered as a rebuttal of previous data since all patients recruited to this study fulfill the criteria for APS and are strictly monitored in tertiary centers, potentially representing a sampling bias when compared to other observational cohorts. In addition, these findings are in line with the concept that aPL is a necessary but insufficient step in the development of thrombosis where a "second hit" probably pushes the haemostatic balance in favor of thrombosis by including added factors necessary for its development, such as uncontrolled traditional cardiovascular risk factors [18,19]. Among the various methods for risk stratifications, aGAPSS displays important advantages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It is important to clarify that this lack of association should not be considered as a rebuttal of previous data since all patients recruited to this study fulfill the criteria for APS and are strictly monitored in tertiary centers, potentially representing a sampling bias when compared to other observational cohorts. In addition, these findings are in line with the concept that aPL is a necessary but insufficient step in the development of thrombosis where a "second hit" probably pushes the haemostatic balance in favor of thrombosis by including added factors necessary for its development, such as uncontrolled traditional cardiovascular risk factors [18,19]. Among the various methods for risk stratifications, aGAPSS displays important advantages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In fact, significantly higher values of aGAPSS were found in patients with stroke. The results are in line with a very recent study from our group showing higher aGAPSS values in patients who experienced acute myocardial infarction compared to those with other thrombosis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 This score was found to be useful for risk stratification in a retrospective study, involving young subjects with AMI, who had experienced at least one thrombotic event (arterial and/or venous). A modified version of aGAPSS including also diabetes, obesity, and smoking habit has been more recently proposed for risk stratification in young APS patients with AMI 45 and in subjects with aPL. 46 However, no consensus exists on the prophylactic treatment of aPL carriers who never developed vascular manifestations.…”
Section: Ischemic Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%