1961
DOI: 10.2307/2406079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adaptive Significances of Intraspecific Trends of Variation in Wing Length and Body Size Among Bird Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anyway, such possible morphological changes might affect flight performance and manoeuvrability (see Hamilton 1961), but were an insufficient explanation for the observed age differences in diet, because the effect remained after excluding all 1 year old males from the analysis. The same result was obtained with both modelling approaches (GLMM and resampling procedure).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, such possible morphological changes might affect flight performance and manoeuvrability (see Hamilton 1961), but were an insufficient explanation for the observed age differences in diet, because the effect remained after excluding all 1 year old males from the analysis. The same result was obtained with both modelling approaches (GLMM and resampling procedure).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causal explanations for the underlying basis of Bergmann's Rule have traditionally invoked the adaptive significance of body size in connection with temperature regulation or conservation of metabolic water (Hamilton, 1961;Mayr, 1963;Brown & Lee, 1969;Power, 1969;James, 1970). An alternative hypothesis is that geographic patterns of size variation primarily reflect selection for fasting endurance during episodic periods of food scarcity in seasonal environments (Boyce, 1979;Lindstedt & Boyce, 1985;Millar & Hickling, 1990).…”
Section: Geographic Variation In Body Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the evaporative surface area/volume ratio is inversely proportional to body size, this hypothesis predicts that larger size is advantageous in hot arid environments, and smaller size is advantageous in hot humid environments. Intraspecific variation in birds of the genus Vireo provides supporting evidence, as birds are smallest in the humid lowland tropics of Central America, and largest in the hot, arid deserts of northern Mexico (Hamilton, 1958(Hamilton, , 1961. Likewise, in the 12 species of North American birds studied by James (1970), body size (as indexed by wing length) was smallest in the hot, humid southeast and exhibited a progressive increase across a westward gradient of increasing aridity and a northward gradient of decreasing temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between body size and latitude in both birds and mammals (Ashton 2002a;Meiri and Dayan 2003;Gardner et al 2009;Olson et al 2009). However, limited information is available on altitudinal variation in body size (Hamilton 1961;Blackburn and Ruggiero 2001;Chown and Klok 2003;Wilson et al 2010;Gutiérrez-Pinto et al 2014). Although latitudinal and altitudinal gradients show similar temperature trends (Ashton and Feldman 2003), some climate factors, such as solar radiation, air pressure (AP) (or oxygen concentration), are more strongly associated with variation in altitude than latitude (Liao et al 2006;Körner 2007, also see Additional file 1: Table S1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%