1998
DOI: 10.1006/fgbi.1998.1048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Actomyosin Cytoskeleton of Amoebae of the Cellular Slime MoldsAcrasis roseaandProtostelium mycophaga: Structure, Biochemical Properties, and Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While our data confirm previous descriptions of Naegleria contractile vacuole dynamics, 1, 47, 60 they refute previous hypotheses of how contractile vacuoles pump. Despite the popularity of the actomyosin contractility hypothesis in the literature, 10, 13, 32, 3436, 84 we and others failed to observe actin around active contractile vacuole bladders in any species, 16, 8588 and disassembly of all actin networks in Naegleria and Dictyostelium failed to halt water expulsion. Furthermore, analytical modeling of this mechanism is unable to explain the dynamics of contractile vacuole emptying in Paramecium.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…While our data confirm previous descriptions of Naegleria contractile vacuole dynamics, 1, 47, 60 they refute previous hypotheses of how contractile vacuoles pump. Despite the popularity of the actomyosin contractility hypothesis in the literature, 10, 13, 32, 3436, 84 we and others failed to observe actin around active contractile vacuole bladders in any species, 16, 8588 and disassembly of all actin networks in Naegleria and Dictyostelium failed to halt water expulsion. Furthermore, analytical modeling of this mechanism is unable to explain the dynamics of contractile vacuole emptying in Paramecium.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The acrasid life cycle is strikingly similar to that of dictyostelids (Baldauf & Strassmann 2017), and acrasids were long considered their primitive relatives (van Tieghem 1880). Due at least in part to this presumed close relationship Acrasis rosea (now Acrasis kona) enjoyed some popularity as an experimental model, especially for the study of cytoskeletal and related features (e.g., Hellstén and Roos 1998). However, the amoebae of acrasids and dictyostelids differ markedly in both morphology and behavior (Olive 1975, Page andBlanton 1985), and molecular phylogeny now places them widely separated in the eukaryote tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%