1941
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1941.134.4.694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Action of Temperature on the Excitability, Spike Height and Configuration, and the Refractory Period Observed in the Responses of Single Medullated Nerve Fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0
1

Year Published

1943
1943
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two reasons why temperature changes give opposite effects on the population spike and the cell discharge probability. First, warming causes shorter action currents with decreased amplitudes (Schoepfle and Erlanger, 1941;Hodgkin and Katz, 1949; Thompson et al, 1985). Increased temperature speeds up the action currents so that the onset of the repolarizing potassium currents occurs earlier than bcforc.…”
Section: Population Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two reasons why temperature changes give opposite effects on the population spike and the cell discharge probability. First, warming causes shorter action currents with decreased amplitudes (Schoepfle and Erlanger, 1941;Hodgkin and Katz, 1949; Thompson et al, 1985). Increased temperature speeds up the action currents so that the onset of the repolarizing potassium currents occurs earlier than bcforc.…”
Section: Population Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be consulted for details about the method used for 802 A. S. PAINTAL determining ARP and how artifacts inherent in earlier work (cf. Erlanger & Gasser, 1937;Schoepfle & Erlanger, 1941) were eliminated. Except for one aberrant point at 84 m/sec all the other points at 200 C (of Fig.…”
Section: Mechanism Underlying Arp the Relation Of Conduction Velocitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wealth of information now exists concerning the modification of various parameters of nervous activity by temperature changes (Lucas, 1908;Garten & Sultze, 1913;Adrian, 1921;Gasser, 1931;Schoepfle & Erlanger, 1941;Lorente de No, 1947;Tasaki & Fujita, 1948;Lundberg, 1948;Hodgkin & Katz, 1949, to mention only a few of the many investigations relevant to the present work). Most of this information applies, however, to the temperature dependence either of the membrane potential or of the different phases of the nerve impulse; little is known of the effect of temperature on the receptor potential, although it has been reported by Burkhardt (1959) that the amplitude of the receptor potential in the stretch receptor of the crayfish increases with decreasing temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%