1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7894(76)80070-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acquisition and generalization of compound sentence structure in an autistic child

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although teaching simpler mands (e.g., single words) is common (Gobbi et al, 1986;Winborn et al, 2002;Yoder et al, 1995) and is considered to be best practice by some (Horner & Day, 1991;Musselwhite & St. Louis, 1988), the current data suggest that training one or a few framed mands after single-word mands have been acquired is likely to result in the emergence of untrained mands (e. g., generalization). These results are somewhat similar to those of Stevens-Long (1974), who evaluated the influence of differential reinforcement on simple and compound sentences and found that training simple sentences resulted in an increase in simple sentences with no effects on compound sentences. Training of compound sentences resulted in an increase of compound sentences and a decrease of simple sentences and, more important, in the production of compound sentences not previously taught.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…First, although teaching simpler mands (e.g., single words) is common (Gobbi et al, 1986;Winborn et al, 2002;Yoder et al, 1995) and is considered to be best practice by some (Horner & Day, 1991;Musselwhite & St. Louis, 1988), the current data suggest that training one or a few framed mands after single-word mands have been acquired is likely to result in the emergence of untrained mands (e. g., generalization). These results are somewhat similar to those of Stevens-Long (1974), who evaluated the influence of differential reinforcement on simple and compound sentences and found that training simple sentences resulted in an increase in simple sentences with no effects on compound sentences. Training of compound sentences resulted in an increase of compound sentences and a decrease of simple sentences and, more important, in the production of compound sentences not previously taught.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Other studies that have built expressive or receptive response classes into the language of subjects of limited verbal ability include the training of receptive prepositions (Frisch & Schumaker, 1974), singular and plural declarative sentences (Garcia, Guess, & Byrnes, 1973), verb tenses (Lutzker & Sherman, 1974;Schumaker & Sherman, 1970), adjectival inflections (Baer & Guess, 1971), compound sentences (Stevens-Long & Rasmussen, 1974), complex sentences (Odom, Liebert, & Fernandez, 1969;Wheeler & Sulzer, 1970), and interrogative sentences (Twardosz & Baer, 1973). Many of these studies point toward the difficulty of teaching retarded or autistic subjects to generalize from, expressive to receptive language or vice versa, an important finding whose implications extend beyond the training of any particular grammatical form.…”
Section: Nonverbal Imitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treze artigos tiveram como participantes crianças com o desenvolvimento atípico (Bennett & Ling, 1972;Garcia et al, 1973;Goldstein et al, 1987;Goldstein, 1989;Guess et al, 1968;Guess, 1969;Lutzker & Sherman, 1974;Martin, 1975;McGee et al, 1985;Sailor, 1971;Shumacker & Sherman, 1970;Stevens-Long et al, 1976;Wheeler & Sulzer, 1970). Sete tiveram como participantes crianças com desenvolvimento típico (Hart & Risley, 1988;Østvik et al, 2012;Ribes et al, 1977;Wright, 2006;Whitehurst & Novak, RBTCC 23 (2021Whitehusrt et al, 1974;Dal Ben & Goyos, 2019), dois foram realizados com estudantes universitários com desenvolvimento típico (Chase et al, 2008;Shimamune et al, 1999), um com adolescente com desenvolvimento atípico (Hicks et al, 2011) e um contou com crianças com desenvolvimento típico e atípico (Clark & Sherman, 1975 Legenda: DT = desenvolvimento típico; DA = desenvolvimento atípico; MET = treino com múltiplos exemplares.…”
Section: Artigos Experimentais Sem O Termo 'Autoclítico'unclassified