EVANS (5) found that the hydrogen ion concentration of blood and sodium bicarbonate solution as determined by the dialysis method of Dale and Evans(3) was pH 0*2 greater than that of the same solution under the same conditions as determined by the hydrogen electrode. After excluding various possible explanations such as loss of C02 during dialysis, he came to the conclusion that the error lay in the hydrogen electrode, and that the platinum black on it catalyses a reduction of the C02 present in the gas atmosphere to formic acid. In view of the fact that the hydrogen electrode is usually regarded as the standard in all measurements of hydrogen ion concentration, it seemed desirable to repeat Evans' experiments.Several workers have already published experiments on this problem, notably Cullen and Hastings(2) who found a perfect agreement between indicator and electrode in the case of bicarbonate solutions; they did not perform any experiments on blood, Warburgu) points out that Evans' explanation of his discrepancy is wrong, since his values of pK, (the constant in the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation) are not dependent on the C02 tension. He has found, moreover, that the combined CO2 in an alkali bicarbonate solution does not decrease when the solution is treated for half an hour or more with hydrogen in the presence of platinum black. These, together with other reasons, led Warburg to the conclusion that Evans allowed the hydrogen in contact with his electrode to become contaminated with oxygen. Indeed, Evans admits in the paper referred to, that sometimes his gas contained oxygen; and the technique which he used would make it very difficult to avoid this. Cullen and Hastings(2), and Chambers (1), on the contrary, ascribe the discrepancies observed in the determination of the cH of blood to the unequal distribution of ions across the dialysis membrane, apparently regardless of the fact that this phenomenon can be ruled out as of