1990
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199010000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
145
4
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
145
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjective interpretation of the questions, LBP beliefs [33] and perception of the activity behavior can result in subjects either underestimating [34] or overestimating [35,36] their levels of physical activity. In general, people tend to overreport physical activity and underestimate sedentary pursuits such as watching television [37]. It is known that, although LBP patients state they are moderately or severely disabled and less active, they still perform activities on a rather normal level [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective interpretation of the questions, LBP beliefs [33] and perception of the activity behavior can result in subjects either underestimating [34] or overestimating [35,36] their levels of physical activity. In general, people tend to overreport physical activity and underestimate sedentary pursuits such as watching television [37]. It is known that, although LBP patients state they are moderately or severely disabled and less active, they still perform activities on a rather normal level [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People tend to overestimate physical activity and to underestimate sedentary activity [Klesges et al, 1990]. These issues are particularly troublesome when attempting to apply self-report techniques to examine physical activity in people with MR.…”
Section: Self-reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been used to measure objectively short-and long-term EE during PA under freeliving conditions. Such techniques included electronic motion sensors (7)(8)(9), heart rate recordings (10,11), doubly labeled water (12), investigator ratings (13), and activity questionnaires (14)(15)(16)(17). Each of these techniques has strengths and limitations as described elsewhere (16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%