The Academic Elite in Library Science: Linkages among Top-Ranked Graduate Programs

Bair, Jeffrey H.; Barrons, Janice C.

doi:10.5860/crl.58.3.233

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This longstanding situation has the potential to result in a permanent status hierarchy—the elevation of status over merit. As Bair and Barrons () have pointed out, 60% of full‐time faculty in the top 10 U.S. LIS departments earned their doctorates at other top‐10 schools. This allows the foremost LIS departments to maintain their status “because it is relatively easy for them to acquire faculty from other elite departments and to place their own graduates in other elite schools” (p. 235).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007–2012

Walters

Wilder

2015

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate the contributions of particular disciplines, countries, and academic departments to the literature of library and information science (LIS) using data for the articles published in 31 journals from 2007 to 2012. In particular, we examine the contributions of authors outside the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada; faculty in departments other than LIS; and practicing librarians. Worldwide, faculty in LIS departments account for 31% of the journal literature; librarians, 23%; computer science faculty, 10%; and management faculty, 10%. The top contributing nations are the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, China, Canada, and Taiwan. Within the United States and the United Kingdom, the current productivity of LIS departments is correlated with past productivity and with other measures of reputation and performance. More generally, the distribution of contributions is highly skewed. In the United States, five departments account for 27% of the articles contributed by LIS faculty; in the United Kingdom, four departments account for nearly twothirds of the articles. This skewed distribution reinforces the possibility that high-status departments may gain a permanent advantage in the competition for students, faculty, journal space, and research funding. At the same time, concentrations of research-active faculty in particular departments may generate beneficial spillover effects.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%