1933
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.44.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Absolute Saturation of Cubic Cobalt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1939
1939
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature search has found no reports about such an image effect in closed-circuit measurements, and the search covers eight decades back to 1926 when Weiss termed the effect as a ''magnetic image'' [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]12,13]. Furthermore, all the reports we found related to the image effect in open-circuit measurements mentioned neither the specimens' geometry effect nor the material type effect.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A literature search has found no reports about such an image effect in closed-circuit measurements, and the search covers eight decades back to 1926 when Weiss termed the effect as a ''magnetic image'' [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]12,13]. Furthermore, all the reports we found related to the image effect in open-circuit measurements mentioned neither the specimens' geometry effect nor the material type effect.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The image effect has been described as related to saturation of the electromagnet (EM) pole-tips. When approaching magnetic saturation, the permeability of the pole tip material diminishes to a marked extent, causing the sensitivity of the measuring apparatus to decrease proportionately [6]. Allen and Constant [6] used an ''image correction coefficient'' in the range of 1.118-2.18 for effective magnetic field H ¼ 6500-11,825 G to report corrections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are 16Co-13Fe-30Ni-1Cr-40Al (at%) and 6Co-52Fe-1Ni-36Cr-5Al (at%), respectively; while for x=0, they are 8Fe-44Ni-1Cr-47Al (at%) and 42Fe-1Ni-42Cr-15Al (at%), respectively. Therefore, quite likely, the high Co content in the B2 phase for the x=0.4 composition, is what causes the strongly ferromagnetic behavior 26,27 ; while the bcc phase in the same case is rather weakly ferromagnetic due to the high content of antiferromagnetic Cr, as well as a lower Co content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in lattice parameters manifests as residual stresses in the built components. In some cases, the magnitude of residual stress in a built part can exceed 50-80% of the yield stress of the material as measured by neutron diffraction 25,26 . This residual stress can easily be reduced via thermomechanical processing, such as annealing steps.…”
Section: Introduction To Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%