2004
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200410001-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ability of the Multiple Mini-Interview to Predict Preclerkship Performance in Medical School

Abstract: While further validity testing is required, the MMI appears better able to predict preclerkship performance relative to traditional tools designed to assess the noncognitive qualities of applicants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
178
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
178
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These can be grouped into ''paper and pencil'' assessments of personality traits (e.g., Adams et al 2012Adams et al , 2015Bore et al 2005a, b;Dowell et al 2011;Fukui et al 2014;James et al 2013;Lumsden et al 2005;Manuel et al 2005;Nedjat et al 2013), structured multiple interview approaches (Dore et al 2010;Eva et al, 2004aEva et al, , b, 2009Hofmeister et al 2008Hofmeister et al , 2009O'Brien et al 2011;Reiter et al 2007;Roberts et al 2008;Rosenfeld et al 2008), selection centres (Gafni et al 2012;ten Cate and Smal 2002;Ziv et al 2008;Gale et al 2010;Randall et al 2006a, b) and-the ''new kid on the block''-situational judgement tests (Christian et al 2010;Koczwara et al 2012;Lievens 2013;Lievens et al 2008;Patterson et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be grouped into ''paper and pencil'' assessments of personality traits (e.g., Adams et al 2012Adams et al , 2015Bore et al 2005a, b;Dowell et al 2011;Fukui et al 2014;James et al 2013;Lumsden et al 2005;Manuel et al 2005;Nedjat et al 2013), structured multiple interview approaches (Dore et al 2010;Eva et al, 2004aEva et al, , b, 2009Hofmeister et al 2008Hofmeister et al , 2009O'Brien et al 2011;Reiter et al 2007;Roberts et al 2008;Rosenfeld et al 2008), selection centres (Gafni et al 2012;ten Cate and Smal 2002;Ziv et al 2008;Gale et al 2010;Randall et al 2006a, b) and-the ''new kid on the block''-situational judgement tests (Christian et al 2010;Koczwara et al 2012;Lievens 2013;Lievens et al 2008;Patterson et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este método de admisión ha sido validado e implementado por primera vez tanto en el Canadá de habla inglesa como en el Canadá de habla francesa (Eva, Reiter, Rosenfeld et al, 2004;St-Onge, Côté&Brailovsky, 2009). Actualmente es utilizado por todas las facultades de medicina del país.…”
Section: Tendencias En Admisión De Estudiantesunclassified
“…The selection interview has been implicated with issues surrounding reliability, validity and fairness [15]. Modifications of the traditional interview, where multiple interview panels conduct structured interviews, have produced encouraging results [16]. A method borrowed from the industrial world, called the 'assessment centre', which assesses the applicant more comprehensively over a longer period of time using a battery of tests have produced good predictive validity especially in postgraduate selection [17].…”
Section: Predictors Of Success During the Medical Careermentioning
confidence: 99%