2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ability of a topical novel combination of fipronil, amitraz and (S)-methoprene to protect dogs from Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infections transmitted by Ixodes scapularis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Preventive products for individual dogs are widely available and well-established in their ability to decrease the degree of ectoparasite exposure and thereby prevent the transmission of infectious diseases by these vectors, including RMSF, 47 leishmaniasis, 64 ehrlichiosis, 65,66 anaplasmosis, and borreliosis. 67 Additionally, parasites such as mites (Cheyletiella spp, Otodectes cyanotis, and Sarcoptes scabiei), although not known to spread pathogens infectious to dogs, are themselves transmissible, most notably in group settings. 7 Fleas are the most common ectoparasites of dogs.…”
Section: Vector Control and Vector-borne Disease Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 Preventive products for individual dogs are widely available and well-established in their ability to decrease the degree of ectoparasite exposure and thereby prevent the transmission of infectious diseases by these vectors, including RMSF, 47 leishmaniasis, 64 ehrlichiosis, 65,66 anaplasmosis, and borreliosis. 67 Additionally, parasites such as mites (Cheyletiella spp, Otodectes cyanotis, and Sarcoptes scabiei), although not known to spread pathogens infectious to dogs, are themselves transmissible, most notably in group settings. 7 Fleas are the most common ectoparasites of dogs.…”
Section: Vector Control and Vector-borne Disease Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be assumed that the risk of pathogen transmission from arthropods to their hosts may be significantly decreased if fleas or ticks are killed quickly enough (in <24 h) and if this speed of kill is sustained during a long period of time (>1 month [2]). Several authors have studied the indirect preventive role of insecticidal and/or acaricidal treatments against the transmission of flea or tick-borne diseases [7, 16–18, 20]. However, essentially all of the flea or tick transmitted pathogens studied were bacteria or protozoa: Ehrlichia canis , Anaplasma phagocytophilum , Borrelia burgdorferi , B. henselae .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies were conducted under laboratory conditions; all existing variables of the vector: host natural state (e.g., vector infection rate and pressure, interrupted tick feeding, variations in the age, breed, and immune status of the host, and presence of other reservoir hosts) cannot be replicated in a laboratory. More importantly, in several studies conducted in dogs the use of commercial acaricidal products protected from an A. phagocytophilum or E. canis infection [8,[23][24][25][26][27]. These products are described as having a slower speed of kill (i.e., time needed after treatment/ re-infestation to kill >90% of attached ticks) compared with fluralaner [23,[28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%