2003
DOI: 10.21236/ada411764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aberdeen Proving Ground Injury Control Project: Influence of a Multiple Intervention Program on Injuries and Fitness Among Ordnance School Soldiers in Advanced Individual Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three U.S. Army programs examined the combined effects of reducing running mileage with other interventions during the basic training and advanced training (130,131,135,138). Experimental groups did not stretch prior to exercise, performed a wide variety of exercises (calisthenics, dumbbell drills, movement drills, interval training, long-distance mnning), and had reduced mnning mileage.…”
Section: (1) Training-related Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three U.S. Army programs examined the combined effects of reducing running mileage with other interventions during the basic training and advanced training (130,131,135,138). Experimental groups did not stretch prior to exercise, performed a wide variety of exercises (calisthenics, dumbbell drills, movement drills, interval training, long-distance mnning), and had reduced mnning mileage.…”
Section: (1) Training-related Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PRT implementations have combined these principles with other approaches to injury reduction. Knapik, Bullock, et al (2003) made this point when they referred to the "multiple intervention" character of the program they studied. The complexity of the interventions makes it impossible to tell whether some PRT principles are more important than others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third study was conducted in Advanced Individual Training (AIT; Knapik, Bullock et al, 2004). Additional detail on the physical training programs can be found in technical reports available from the Defense Technical Information Center (Knapik, Hauret, et al, 2001;Knapik, Bullock, et al, 2003;Knapik, Dahakjy et al, 2004). Table 1 gives the size, age, and gender composition for the sample in each study.…”
Section: Methods Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average gains seen in military training units are primarily the result of large gains by the least-fit individuals; individuals who are relatively highly fit initially essentially maintain their fitness. This trend has been evident in at least six studies (Demarle, Heugas, Slawinski, Tricot, Koralsztein, & Billat, 2003;Dyrstad, 2006;Knapik, Bullock, Canada, Toney, Wells, Hoedebecke, et al, 2003;Legaz Arrese, Serrano Ostariz, Casajus Mallen, & Munguia Izquierdo, 2005; Rosendal, Langberg, Skov-Jensen, & Kjaer, 2003; Trank, Ryman, Minagawa, Trone, & Shaffer, 2001). Figure 2 compares the present findings and the results in those studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%