2022
DOI: 10.18174/580782
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ABCD of food systems resilience: an assessment framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, links between the 3R concepts and practice are not sufficiently well developed and strategies are needed to improve these links. Key components to consider in light of these resilience concepts include agency (of actors in responding to shocks), buffering (resources to fall back on in times of stress), connectivity (and communication between actors and market segments) and diversity (across scales and places in the interacting systems) 4 . Building resilience in practice has hence been associated with the capacity and agency of food system actors to develop connections across multiple levels on spatial, temporal and jurisdictional scales, and to respond to disruptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, links between the 3R concepts and practice are not sufficiently well developed and strategies are needed to improve these links. Key components to consider in light of these resilience concepts include agency (of actors in responding to shocks), buffering (resources to fall back on in times of stress), connectivity (and communication between actors and market segments) and diversity (across scales and places in the interacting systems) 4 . Building resilience in practice has hence been associated with the capacity and agency of food system actors to develop connections across multiple levels on spatial, temporal and jurisdictional scales, and to respond to disruptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%