2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaafcf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3CR Chandra Snapshot Survey: Extragalactic Radio Sources with Redshifts between 1 and 1.5

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of newly acquired X-ray observations of 16 extragalactic radio sources, listed in the Third Cambridge Revised (3CR) catalog, and not previously observed by Chandra. Observations were performed during Chandra Cycle 17, extending X-ray coverage for the 3CR extragalactic catalog up to z=1.5. Among the 16 targets, two lie at z <0.5 (i.e., 3CR 27, at z=0.184 and 3CR 69, at z=0.458), all the remaining 14 have redshifts between 1.0 and 1.5. In the current sample there a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chandra flux map has been built adopting the same procedure adopted for the 3CR Chandra Snapshot Survey (see e.g. Massaro et al 2010Massaro et al , 2013Massaro et al , 2015Stuardi et al 2018;Jimenez-Gallardo et al 2020 for additional details), as well as adopting the FLUXIMAGE task of CIAO. Finally, we highlight that the readout streak, present in the Chandra observation given the relatively high flux of the X-ray nucleus, was also removed in the image shown in Fig.…”
Section: S U M M a Ry A N D C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chandra flux map has been built adopting the same procedure adopted for the 3CR Chandra Snapshot Survey (see e.g. Massaro et al 2010Massaro et al , 2013Massaro et al , 2015Stuardi et al 2018;Jimenez-Gallardo et al 2020 for additional details), as well as adopting the FLUXIMAGE task of CIAO. Finally, we highlight that the readout streak, present in the Chandra observation given the relatively high flux of the X-ray nucleus, was also removed in the image shown in Fig.…”
Section: S U M M a Ry A N D C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-ray data of the remaining 25 sources (twentytwo 3C sources, PKS B1421-490, PKS 1413+135, and PKS 0237-23) have been analyzed and published in various papers (Massaro et al 2010(Massaro et al , 2011(Massaro et al , 2012Hardcastle et al 2012;Massaro et al 2013Massaro et al , 2015Stuardi et al 2018;Henley et al 2010). However, these works mainly focused on either only the flux (e.g., Massaro et al 2015) or the extended X-ray emission.…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete high-z 3C sample of 64 sources has been observed at X-rays with Chandra and some with XMM. The observations in the Chandra Data Archive have been reinvestigated by Wilkes et al (2013), Massaro et al (2015), Stuardi et al (2018), andJimenez-Gallardo et al (2020). The advantage of Chandra is its high spatial resolution, while XMM is more sensitive to faint extended emission provided that this emission is not outshone by bright embedded point sources.…”
Section: Comparison With X-ray and Sunyaev-zel'dovichmentioning
confidence: 99%