The 3-min appraisal of a meta-analysis

Hussain, Nasir; Bookwala, Ammar; Sancheti, Parag; Bhandari, Mohit

doi:10.4103/0019-5413.73652

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We at Indian Journal of Orthopaedics attempt to appraise the readership with the best available evidence on controversies of fracture management. We provide guidelines 5 6 to evaluate the methodology of various types of research reported. We must realize that the evidence reported are based on studies having similar best of infrastructure, instrumentations and surgical training.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The rational treatment of fractures: Use the evidence with caution

Jain

2011

IJOO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The rational treatment of fractures: Use the evidence with caution

Jain

2011

IJOO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Following the PRISMA statement, the present study established the quality of our identified studies ( Page et al, 2021 ). The quality of the quantitative studies was assessed according to the AXIS procedure ( Downes et al, 2016 ); the quality of the qualitative studies to the CASP procedure for qualitative studies ( Long et al, 2020 ); the quality of the mixed methods studies according to MMAT procedure ( Hong et al, 2018 ); the quality of the meta-analysis according to the 3-MIN procedure ( Hussain et al, 2011 ) and the quality of the systematic review according to the CASP procedure for systematic reviews ( Nadelson and Nadelson, 2014 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Burnout among general practitioners, a systematic quantitative review of the literature on determinants of burnout and their ecological value

Verhoef

Blomme

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Burnout is a major social and economic problem, specifically among general practitioners (GPs). The amount of literature on generic determinants of burnout is impressive. However, the size of the library on occupation-specific determinants of burnout among GPs are minimal. With the present study, we aim to gain insight into the existing academic literature on generic and occupation-specific determinants of burnout among GPs. Moreover, we aim to contribute to the ecological validity of this study by emphasizing occupation-specific determinants. We conducted a systematic quantitative literature review in which we followed the PRISMA statement and performed quality assessments according to the AXIS, CASP, MMAT, and 3-MIN procedures. Furthermore, we assessed frequency effect sizes (FES) and intensity effect sizes (IES). By performing Fisher’s exact tests, we investigated whether the quality of the studies influenced the outcomes. An extensive literature search revealed 60 eligible studies among which 28 strong studies, 29 moderate studies, and 3 weak studies were identified. Analyzing those studies delivered 75 determinants of burnout, of which 33 were occupation-specific for GPs. According to the average FES, occupation-specific determinants play a significant role in acquiring burnout compared to the generic determinants. The results of the Fisher exact tests provided evidence that the quality of the 60 studies did not affect the outcomes. We conclude that it is surprising that a profession with such an important social position and such a high risk of burnout has been so little researched.

show abstract

Towards Nuts and Bolts of Conducting Literature Review: A Typology of Literature Review

Taherdoost

2023

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Literature reviews demonstrate the progress of knowledge and a comprehensive understanding of related phenomena, contexts, and variables in any subject. Learning how to efficiently conduct a literature review is crucial to succeeding in an academic and even up-to-speed career. Summing up and synthesizing previous research in a particular field of interest indicates enjoying a thorough grasp of the available knowledge. It also lends a hand in learning and moving forward towards being professional in a particular milieu. However, an unorganized growth in literature may hinder amelioration by broaching the probability of complicated, competing, and implausible arguments in the scholarly inquiry. This study is a just-out attempt to develop a typology of review types and present an explanatory insight into the most typical and applicable literature reviews by relying on the aim, significance, applicability, and pros and cons. The goals of conducted typology are to study and analysis different types of literature review to assist researchers to commence their evaluations and place their contribution.

show abstract

The 3-min appraisal of a meta-analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

The rational treatment of fractures: Use the evidence with caution

The rational treatment of fractures: Use the evidence with caution

Burnout among general practitioners, a systematic quantitative review of the literature on determinants of burnout and their ecological value

Towards Nuts and Bolts of Conducting Literature Review: A Typology of Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About