2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00029-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
300
6
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
23
300
6
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with previous reports (for a review see Manning et al 6 ), a sex difference in 2D:4D was found, as mean male 2D:4D ratio was significantly lower than mean female 2D:4D. The difference was statistically significant for left-hand 2D:4D ratio but not for the right-hand 2D:4D ratio (unpaired t-tests; right hand: t(242) ¼ 0.992, P ¼ 0.322; left hand: t(242) ¼ 2.681, P ¼ 0.008).…”
Section: Sex Differencessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In accordance with previous reports (for a review see Manning et al 6 ), a sex difference in 2D:4D was found, as mean male 2D:4D ratio was significantly lower than mean female 2D:4D. The difference was statistically significant for left-hand 2D:4D ratio but not for the right-hand 2D:4D ratio (unpaired t-tests; right hand: t(242) ¼ 0.992, P ¼ 0.322; left hand: t(242) ¼ 2.681, P ¼ 0.008).…”
Section: Sex Differencessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The 2nd and 4th digits were measured on the palmar surface of the hand from the basal crease proximal to the palm to the tip of the finger using Vernier calipers measuring to 0.01 mm (for reviews see Garn et al 5 , Manning et al 6 ). It should be noted that accurate calculation of 2D:4D is not dependent on measurement of finger lengths to 0.01 mm as sexual dimorphism in 2D:4D has been shown from measurements made to the nearest mm with a ruler or tape measure.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 2D:4D ratio has been studied in the context of reproductive success (Manning et al, 2000), sex-typed behavior (Csathó et al, 2003a), spatial/cognitive abilities (Csathó et al, 2003b;Kempel et al, 2005;Manning, 2002; but see Coolican & Peters, 2003), adult personality characteristics (Austin, Manning, McInroy, & Matthews, 2002;Bailey & Hurd, 2005a;Fink, Manning, & Neave, 2004), and more recently in the context of psychopathology (Arato, Frecska, Beck, An, & Kiss, 2004;Bailey & Hurd, 2005b;Klump et al, 2006;Manning, BaronCohen, Wheelwright, & Sanders, 2001;McFadden, Westhafer, Pasanen, Carlson, & Tucker, 2005;Walder, Andersson, McMillan, Breedlove, & Walker, 2006). Generally, digit ratios show positive correlations with female-typical behaviors and negative correlations with male-typical behaviors (for review, see Putz, Gaulin, Sporter, & McBurney, 2004), and this pattern of results appears to generalize to sex-linked psychopathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%