“…Specifically, table S.1 in the online supporting information illustrates the disconnect between what the results from 2D:4D studies show versus how scholars have talked about the empirical status of this relationship in the literature. For example, even though the most common outcome in this literature by far is a null result, scholars consistently have claimed that a “wide variety of studies” (Kuepper and Hennig, : 65), “numerous studies” (Schwerdtfeger, Heims, and Heer, : 270), “a number of studies” (Austin et al., : 1115), and “many studies” (Yang et al., : 50) all have shown that the 2D:4D ratio is correlated with a “dizzying” array of outcomes (Manning, ), with “several personality traits” (van der Meij et al., : 208) and “several psychological traits” (Bailey and Hurd, : 216; Dogan et al., : 152) such as aggression, risk seeking, and impulsivity. By comparison, efforts to describe this literature as either “mixed” or “inconclusive” have been rare (Aycinena, Baltadounis, and Rentschler, ; Gorka et al., ; Sapienza et al., ).…”