1972
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(72)90462-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2H(3He, γ)5Li reaction from 2–26 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again we note that the most complete databases of nuclear data such as (EXFOR, 2013), as well as well-known atomic characteristics databases, for example, PHYSICS, CDFE, NASA DATA (Fundamental Physical Constants, 2010;Nuclear Wallet Cards database, 2014), contain only these data for total cross sections of 3 He( 2 H,γ) 5 Li capture at low energies. Besides them, however, there are several publications (Blair et al 1954;Kraus et al 1968;Del Bianco et al 1968;King et al 1972;Balbes et al 1994;Weller & Balbes 1998) in which measurements of the number of events observed in the experiment, polarizations, and differential capture cross sections are realized. Therefore, we perform a recalculation of some of the experimental measurements of these studies with the extraction of the total cross sections from them.…”
Section: Nuclear Physics Aspects and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Once again we note that the most complete databases of nuclear data such as (EXFOR, 2013), as well as well-known atomic characteristics databases, for example, PHYSICS, CDFE, NASA DATA (Fundamental Physical Constants, 2010;Nuclear Wallet Cards database, 2014), contain only these data for total cross sections of 3 He( 2 H,γ) 5 Li capture at low energies. Besides them, however, there are several publications (Blair et al 1954;Kraus et al 1968;Del Bianco et al 1968;King et al 1972;Balbes et al 1994;Weller & Balbes 1998) in which measurements of the number of events observed in the experiment, polarizations, and differential capture cross sections are realized. Therefore, we perform a recalculation of some of the experimental measurements of these studies with the extraction of the total cross sections from them.…”
Section: Nuclear Physics Aspects and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Del Bianco et al 1968) for  0 + 1 ,  -from (Schroder & Mausberg 1970) for  0 , ◄ -from Ref. (King et al 1972) for  0 , ♦ for  0 and ◊ for  1 -from Aliotta et al 2001), ►-from (Weller & Balbes 1998;Balbes et al 1994) for  0 , the solid curve from (Kiptily et al 2006) for  0 .…”
Section: Nuclear Physics Aspects and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To determine the number of counts in the y,+, peak, we unfolded the spectrum by a least squares fit method; the background was set equal to an exponential plus a constant function, Charge integrator calibration Target thickness Solid angle subtended by the NaI crystal collimator at the target Extrapolation of the y-ray spectrum Attenuation in paraffin between target and NaI crystal Efficiency of NaI crystal spectrometer Total and the three peaks for the yo, y, +, , and y(15.1) y-rays were represented with a line shape given by (10) with The peak-shape parameters in A(k) had previously been determined by a least squares fit to monoenergetic y-ray spectra of the ,H(p, y)4He reaction (1 1). Thus, eight free parameters were required for the fit of the 12C(3He, y) spectrum: the height and position of each of the peaks and two parameters for the background.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%