2020
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2018 Mw 6.8 Zakynthos (Ionian Sea, Greece) earthquake: seismic source and local tsunami characterization

Abstract: SUMMARY We investigated the kinematic rupture model of the 2018 Mw 6.8 Zakynthos, Ionian Sea (Greece), earthquake by using a non-linear joint inversion of strong motion data, high-rate GPS time-series and static coseismic GPS displacements. We also tested inversion results against tide-gauge recordings of the small tsunami generated in the Ionian Sea. In order to constrain the fault geometry, we performed several preliminary kinematic inversions by assuming the parameter values resulting from di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our seismological results support the failure of a splay-thrust fault, we believe that seismological data alone cannot safely discriminate between the two scenarios because of the uncertainty on the depth and dip angle estimations for the aftershocks, as well as the ambiguity in the MT decomposition. However, the scenario of a splay-thrust fault is further supported here by published seismic reflection and bathymetric data ( Figures 1 and 4, Figure S23) that reveal numerous ∼ NNW-SSE trending thrusts that dip 30°-50° to the northeast, beneath Zakynthos and western Peloponnese (Kokkalas et al, 2013;Makris & Papoulia, 2014;Sachpazi et al, 2000;Wardell et al, 2014; this study) and the recording of a minor (10 cm) tsunami along the western coastline of Peloponnese that suggests rupture of the sea-bed (Cirella et al, 2020). It is also supported by the low-dipping (<15°-17°) angle of the plate-interface beneath the epicentral area (e.g., Halpaap et al, 2018;Sachpazi et al, 2000).…”
Section: Mainshock and Aftershock Kinematicssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…While our seismological results support the failure of a splay-thrust fault, we believe that seismological data alone cannot safely discriminate between the two scenarios because of the uncertainty on the depth and dip angle estimations for the aftershocks, as well as the ambiguity in the MT decomposition. However, the scenario of a splay-thrust fault is further supported here by published seismic reflection and bathymetric data ( Figures 1 and 4, Figure S23) that reveal numerous ∼ NNW-SSE trending thrusts that dip 30°-50° to the northeast, beneath Zakynthos and western Peloponnese (Kokkalas et al, 2013;Makris & Papoulia, 2014;Sachpazi et al, 2000;Wardell et al, 2014; this study) and the recording of a minor (10 cm) tsunami along the western coastline of Peloponnese that suggests rupture of the sea-bed (Cirella et al, 2020). It is also supported by the low-dipping (<15°-17°) angle of the plate-interface beneath the epicentral area (e.g., Halpaap et al, 2018;Sachpazi et al, 2000).…”
Section: Mainshock and Aftershock Kinematicssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Others [ 51 ] supported that the earthquake ruptured the Hellenic megathrust plate interface along a N-S striking thrust/oblique-slip fault with a length of ~26 km and low-dip angle (23°) but at a depth of <15 km. On the other hand, a complex pattern was suggested for the 2018 mainshock consisting of two fault segments: a low-dip thrust, and a dominant, moderate-dip, right-lateral strike-slip, both in the crust [ 52 ]. Slip vectors, oriented to SW, are consistent with the plate motion and the sequence can be explained in terms of trench-orthogonal fractures in the subducting plate and reactivated faults in the upper plate [ 52 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a complex pattern was suggested for the 2018 mainshock consisting of two fault segments: a low-dip thrust, and a dominant, moderate-dip, right-lateral strike-slip, both in the crust [ 52 ]. Slip vectors, oriented to SW, are consistent with the plate motion and the sequence can be explained in terms of trench-orthogonal fractures in the subducting plate and reactivated faults in the upper plate [ 52 ]. According to a different analysis [ 53 ], the preferred rupture model is the one with a N9°E-striking 39°ESE-dipping plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following large-magnitude earthquakes (M w > 6), the geometry of the fault associated with the main rupture, as well as its slip distribution, is often estimated using seismological and geodetic tools (e.g. Koper et al 2011;Yokota et al 2011;Grandin et al 2015;Cirella et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we apply the clustering toolbox to the aftershock sequence of the 25 October 2018 M w 6.9 Zakynthos (Greece) earthquake (Chousianitis & Konca 2019;Cirella et al 2020;Ganas et al 2020;Karakostas et al 2020;Mouslopoulou et al 2020;Sokos et al 2020). The data set includes >2300 events with M ≥ 2.8 recorded at 33 stations from 25/10/2018 to 14/11/2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%